← Teams

N OR-SHC-Hill

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Kim Hill
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
—
Lisa Gray
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.23
Carol Woolman
published 4.5
4.02
Karen Sullivan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.92
Xia Wu
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.91
Kimberly Quach
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.67
Anne McCroskey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Toni Kidd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Launi Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Donna Roisom
usually #3 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.60
Donna Feuerherdt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.50
Linda Graham
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
Results7 ties
2022-11-20Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesLinda Anderson / Kimberly Quach vs Claire Thayer / Monika Dolega-kowalewski6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCarol Woolman / Xia Wu vs Shannon Fraser / June Wu6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Gray / Kim Hill vs Kristin Fudalla / Katherine Kralj3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-11-12Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesCarol Woolman / Lisa Gray vs Mariniah Prendergast / Shannon Dilorenzo6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKim Hill / Xia Wu vs Lori Layne / Mary Kurz6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLinda Graham / Anne McCroskey vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-11-06Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesLisa Gray / Kimberly Quach vs Katherine Kralj / Monika Dolega-kowalewski6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCarol Woolman / Kim Hill vs Sandy Garry / June Wu4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Sullivan / Xia Wu vs Marie Picard / Kristin Fudalla6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-11-05Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesLisa Gray / Kimberly Quach vs Becky Rey / Gale Volk6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesXia Wu / Karen Sullivan vs Tami Oglesby / Yumiko Pike3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDonna Roisom / Linda Fosberg vs Cindy Rushall / Nenette Olson6-3, 6-3
2022-10-30Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesLinda Graham / Donna Feuerherdt vs Cathy Porter / Lisa Lyon6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLinda Fosberg / Donna Roisom vs Jackie Dooris / Takumi Koyama6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Mathews / Toni Kidd vs Angie Lee / Karen Dellinger6-3, 7-6
2022-10-14Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesLisa Gray / Linda Anderson vs Chiho Cronk / Michelle Donato6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKim Hill / Carol Woolman vs Sue Gregoire / Deanna Lautenbach6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAnne McCroskey / Launi Smith vs Yuko Hopman / Sarah Morris6-1, 6-4
2022-10-01Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesKim Hill / Carol Woolman vs Trina Denson / Stacy Hawkins Parker1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLinda Anderson / Kimberly Quach vs Mariniah Prendergast / Catherine Go6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDonna Feuerherdt / Launi Smith vs Sara Salvi / Gay Hart6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Kim Hill
94W–59L career
0%98%2%
4.26
4.5
Lisa Gray
90W–56L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Carol Woolman
31W–13L career · type S
1%96%3%
4.23
4.5
Karen Sullivan
62W–81L career
12%88%0%
4.02
4.5
Xia Wu
54W–79L career · type A
33%67%0%
3.92
4.5
Kimberly Quach
110W–96L career
36%64%0%
3.91
4
Anne McCroskey
34W–52L career
6%94%0%
3.67
4
Toni Kidd
57W–59L career
4%96%0%
3.66
4
Launi Smith
50W–54L career
17%81%2%
3.65
4
Donna Roisom
100W–85L career
9%91%0%
3.63
4
Donna Feuerherdt
65W–68L career
13%87%0%
3.60
4
Linda Graham
76W–76L career
35%65%0%
3.50

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.