Teams

Stevenson/Nashville

2024 Combo 18 & Over - Nashville · 6.5 Women - Tuesday AM & PM

16 players · average NTRP 3.36 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-09-24vs Conyers/Vogel/NashvilleLost 01
L#1 DoublesCindy Denson / Elizabeth Ward vs Whitney Conyers / Paige Patton1-6, 1-6
2024-08-27vs Ouellette/Senna/NashvilleLost 01
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Ward / Suzanne Lawing vs Jaclyn Carney / Lisa Yawn2-6, 4-6
2024-08-13vs Fisher/Gilbert/NashvilleWon 10
W#3 DoublesRachel Stevenson / Elizabeth Ward vs Amy Kocian / Lori Adams6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women - Tuesday AM & PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Bethany Liles
published 4
3.43
Michelle Palk
published
3.41
Joni Lee
published
3.28
Bettina Moore
published 3.5
3.16
Kristi Broome
published
3.15
Kate Mikes
published
3.06
Desiree Appleby
published 3.5
3.05
Whitney Thompson
published
3.04
Suzanne Lawing
published
3.01
Jenny Pankow
published
2.96
Elizabeth Ward
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.91
Brandi White
published 3
2.87
Cindy Denson
published 3
2.75
Lauren Hocker
published
Courtney Conklin
published 3
Jessica Snider
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joni Lee + Bethany Liles9071% games+18.5% vs expected
Bettina Moore + Whitney Thompson6554% games+5.7% vs expected
Suzanne Lawing + Lauren Hocker1434% games−6.8% vs expected
Michelle Palk + Desiree Appleby1442% games−11.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bethany Liles
13W–4L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
Michelle Palk
12W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
Joni Lee
27W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Bettina Moore
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Kristi Broome
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
Kate Mikes
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Desiree Appleby
4W–17L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.06
Whitney Thompson
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.05
Suzanne Lawing
10W–12L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
Jenny Pankow
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.01
3.5
Elizabeth Ward
110W–130L career · 5 lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Brandi White
5W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Cindy Denson
4W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.87
Lauren Hocker
17W–23L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Courtney Conklin
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jessica Snider
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.