Teams

Liberty Park-Volleydolls

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 3.0W AM

15 players · average NTRP 2.90 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-06Won 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Madison / Nancy Orme vs Robin Asmar / Magdalena Kovacsovics6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLiz Baucom vs Melissa Child6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLiz Bell / MacY Bell vs Alison Barber / Brittany Pope2-6, 5-7
2025-07-30vs Ivory Ridge-Wily/TaylorLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennifer Madison / Keri Masson vs Becky Fajardo / Megan Mullins6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesRebecca Anderson vs Shellie Black6-1, 5-5
L#2 DoublesNiki Evans / Teresa Jackson vs Mary Scoresby / Jill Broadbent6-7, 3-6
2025-07-23Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKeri Masson vs Autumn Iverson3-6, 4-6
2025-07-16vs Utah/Krueger/40&Over3.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesKeri Masson / Nancy Orme vs Kelly Krueger / Conni Gull6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnna Pearce / Liz Baucom vs Melanie Schlachter / Marcey Goldner1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMegan Berceau / Kassie Belcher vs Patricia Moran / Sheri Jacobs6-4, 6-1
2025-07-09vs SunPro-Cardall/OliverosLost 12
L#1 DoublesMacY Bell / Erin Massey vs Chrissy Oliveros / Liz Donaldson2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKassie Belcher vs Emily Lillywhite1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAnna Pearce / Megan Berceau vs Nicole Collins / Lee Ann Hobbs6-1, 6-0
2025-07-02vs Sports Mall-Stroud-Peterson/SweatWon 21
L#1 DoublesKeri Masson / Jennifer Madison vs Karen Rozsa / Jennifer Sweat1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Orme / Liz Baucom vs Summer Borla / Emily Matheson6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMegan Berceau / Niki Evans vs Mary Jayne Child / Tracee Kemp6-3, 7-6
2025-06-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Madison / Nancy Orme vs Amanda Krejci / Jane Woolley2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-11vs Ivory Ridge-Wily/TaylorLost 12
W#1 DoublesCortney Nebeker / Erin Massey vs Allyson Smith / Jill Broadbent0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLiz Baucom / Marie Gardner vs Gaylynn Gale / Shellie Black0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKassie Belcher / Niki Evans vs Becky Fajardo / Megan Mullins3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Nancy Orme
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.08
Jennifer Madison
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #1 Singles 36% · published
3.04
Cortney Nebeker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.81
Liz Baucom
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.79
Megan Berceau
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Singles 36% · published 3
2.76
Liz Bell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Erin Massey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Anna Pearce
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Rebecca Anderson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.61
Keri Masson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.57
Niki Evans
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.56
Gretchen Pettey
published
2.47
MacY Bell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.36
Kassie Belcher
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.33
Marie Gardner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Madison + Nancy Orme7164% games+11.2% vs expected
Erin Massey + Nancy Orme7361% games+10.9% vs expected
Megan Berceau + Liz Bell6064% games+5.7% vs expected
Rebecca Anderson + Erin Massey4351% games+5.6% vs expected
Liz Baucom + Liz Bell9654% games+4.9% vs expected
Liz Baucom + Erin Massey9461% games+4.6% vs expected
Rebecca Anderson + Liz Bell4456% games+4.5% vs expected
Keri Masson + Nancy Orme4650% games+4.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Orme
65W–49L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.13
Jennifer Madison
63W–54L career · 11 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Cortney Nebeker
45W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.04
3
Liz Baucom
72W–55L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Megan Berceau
71W–78L career · 11 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Liz Bell
48W–35L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
Erin Massey
61W–53L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Anna Pearce
53W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Rebecca Anderson
45W–63L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
Keri Masson
48W–33L career · 4 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Niki Evans
52W–45L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%30%70%
2.57
Gretchen Pettey
28W–19L career · no lines in 2025
0%34%66%
2.56
MacY Bell
35W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.47
2.5
Kassie Belcher
38W–67L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%84%16%
2.36
Marie Gardner
20W–38L career · 1 line in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.