Teams

Show Your Love

2023 Baltimore Mixed 18 & Over · Baltimore Mixed 18 & 7.0 Over

8 players · average NTRP 3.60 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-31vs Doubles JeopardySplit 11
W#1 DoublesColin Exelby / Susan Sibol vs Beyza Akcam / Stuart Cohen6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDennis Dietz / Carolyn Wescott vs Kate Fleming / George Sybert6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2023-03-19vs Der-CarleLost 02
L#2 DoublesColin Exelby / Lesley Tompkins vs Jessica Walsh / Peng Zhang6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTerry McDonnell / Kristin Seidl vs Sean Der / Jean Acuna3-6, 0-6
2023-03-12vs Racket ScientistsLost 02
L#2 DoublesSherri Jones / Jon Roll vs Michael Vanderputten / Cynthia Miller3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKristin Seidl / Terry McDonnell vs Thomas Ioannou / Christine Ioannou6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2023-03-04Won 20
W#2 DoublesJon Roll / Sherri Jones vs Eric Kruk / Misty Doonis6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesWilliam Pettus / Susan Sibol vs Nicolaus Wiegmann / Lisa Oxenham6-4, 6-0
2023-02-19vs Der-CarleLost 02
L#2 DoublesSusan Sibol / Dennis Dietz vs Sean Der / Elizabeth Scott6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSherri Jones / Jon Roll vs Rongfeng Li / Maneesha Ahluwalia3-6, 6-7
2023-02-05Won 10
W#3 DoublesColin Exelby / Lesley Tompkins vs Andrew Jordan / Sharon Andrulot7-5, 6-3
2023-01-27vs Doubles JeopardyLost 01
L#2 DoublesColin Exelby / Susan Sibol vs George Sybert / Tracy Flaherty4-6, 3-6
2023-01-15vs Racket ScientistsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRajesh Jari / Carolyn Wescott vs Laura Haney / Jeremy Meckley2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKristin Seidl / Terry McDonnell vs Christine Ioannou / Thomas Ioannou6-2, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Baltimore Mixed 18 & 7.0 Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Susan Sibol
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Kathy Pettus
published
3.45
Lesley Tompkins
published
3.41
Colin Exelby
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.17
Jon Roll
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Carolyn Wescott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.05
Kristin Seidl
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Leo McCafferty
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Susan Sibol
148W–71L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.83
Kathy Pettus
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
94%6%<1%
3.79
Lesley Tompkins
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
3.45
3.5
Colin Exelby
64W–28L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Jon Roll
32W–41L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Carolyn Wescott
60W–77L career · 2 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Kristin Seidl
66W–77L career · 3 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.05
Leo McCafferty
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.