← Teams

IRV-Lang

2020 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Paul Laurent
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Steve Harris
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Randy Boose
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Tod Breslau
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Jonathan Steinhoff
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Scott Beall
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.83
Jim Gerber
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.79
James Lang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
—
Alan Karpinski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 0
—
Jonathan Harms
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 0
Results8 ties
2019-11-15Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesBruce Robertson / Jim Gerber vs Larry Kaster / Alan Potts5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJames Lang / Scott Beall vs Richard Jennings / Robert Burlingame7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPaul Laurent / Jonathan Harms vs Mark Becker / Makoto Sakaguchi6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2019-11-09Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesRandy Boose / Gordon Osaka vs Loren Davis / Lynn Marzette4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesScott Beall / Don Brown vs Mark Muckerheide / Stanley Hanks6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSteve Harris / Jonathan Steinhoff vs Charles Hahn / Jon Peters3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2019-11-03Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesDavid Keller / Jim Gerber vs Larry Kaster / Bill Lowblad6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJonathan Steinhoff / Steve Harris vs Alan Potts / Ronald Meier3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2019-10-27Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesRandy Boose / Gordon Osaka vs Jeff Gonzales / Clay Funkhouser6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDavid Keller / Jim Gerber vs Paul Stutzman / Michael Rich7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDave Brown / Scott Beall vs Aaron Bowman / Kirk Planck4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2019-10-20Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesJim Gerber / David Keller vs Bert Berends / Jeffrey Metke6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJonathan Harms / Alan Karpinski vs Jim George / Douglas Stirling6-0, 7-5
2019-10-12Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesSteve Harris / Paul Laurent vs Tony Moreno / Stan Ihori6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesScott Beall / Don Brown vs DuplicateErasmo DuplicateGonzalez / Gary Townsend6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDave Brown / James Lang vs Brian Noll / David Lee6-3, 6-2
2019-09-22Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesPaul Laurent / Jonathan Steinhoff vs Douglas Metzker / Rand Zoborowski6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDon Brown / Jonathan Harms vs James Prouty / Daniel Moore Jr6-0, 6-0
2019-09-14Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesPaul Laurent / Jonathan Steinhoff vs Kimbal Logan / Jon Peters1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTod Breslau / Steve Harris vs Loren Davis / Mark Muckerheide6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDave Brown / Alan Karpinski vs Wei Pan / Stanley Hanks6-7, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Paul Laurent
68W–62L career
0%98%2%
3.31
3.5
Steve Harris
68W–64L career
1%98%1%
3.29
3.5
Randy Boose
42W–25L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Tod Breslau
7W–12L career · type S
not enough data
—
3.5
Jonathan Steinhoff
18W–28L career
16%82%2%
3.17
3.5
Scott Beall
29W–41L career
23%77%0%
3.06
3
Jim Gerber
66W–48L career · type A
0%98%2%
2.83
3
James Lang
31W–28L career
1%98%1%
2.79
0
Alan Karpinski
7W–9L career
not enough data
—
0
Jonathan Harms
7W–22L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.