Teams

GKeiffer/HBartell (Veterans Park)

2025 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 2.5 Women - Mon PM

6 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-21vs DCallinan/KGibson (Raintree)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesEmma Browder vs Krista Gibson3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesBeth Stephens vs Kelly Wolff6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-07-14vs KWankhedkar/SGalvin (Park Road)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesGrace Keiffer vs Yesol Kwon0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesHailey Foreman vs JJ Zhu6-2, 6-0
L#3 SinglesBeth Stephens vs Kashmira Wankhedkar1-6, 5-7
2025-06-30vs DCallinan/KGibson (Raintree)Lost 12
W#1 SinglesEmma Browder vs Crissa Klein6-3, 3-1
L#2 SinglesKaitlin Maurer vs Donna Callinan6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesBeth Stephens vs Christina Hall2-6, 3-6
2025-06-23vs KWankhedkar/SGalvin (Park Road)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesBeth Stephens vs Suzanne Galvin1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesRebecca Musante vs Haley Tran2-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesHailey Foreman vs Sarah Edwards6-1, 6-4
2025-06-18vs DCallinan/KGibson (Raintree)Lost 12
W#1 SinglesKaitlin Maurer vs Crissa Klein3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesHailey Foreman vs Krista Gibson7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesGrace Keiffer vs Rebecca Plaisance6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-06-02vs KWankhedkar/SGalvin (Park Road)Split 11
W#1 SinglesHailey Foreman vs JJ Zhu3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKaitlin Maurer vs Haley Tran5-7, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 18 & Over Singles 2.5 Women - Mon PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KWankhedkar/SGalvin (Park Road)5111715128
2DCallinan/KGibson (Raintree)4211720155
3GKeiffer/HBartell (Veterans Park)0651328178

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.37 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Emma Browder
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.60
Hailey Foreman
usually #3 Singles 38%, also #2 Singles 38% · published 3
2.47
Kaitlin Maurer
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.37
Rebecca Musante
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Beth Stephens
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.04
Grace Keiffer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hailey Foreman + Kaitlin Maurer314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Emma Browder
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Hailey Foreman
20W–19L career · 8 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.60
Kaitlin Maurer
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%58%42%
2.47
Rebecca Musante
13W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
0%85%15%
2.37
2.5
Beth Stephens
2W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Grace Keiffer
3W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.