Teams

Bi.Francis55M

2025 Capital Mixed 55 & Over · 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-24vs St.Rabby55MWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Cockrill / Charles George vs Lisa Scott / Ken Glanville6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2025-07-23vs Re.Procter55MWon 20
W#2 DoublesEd Brown / Mollie Hodl vs Jack Pyritz / Rebecca Procter6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBob Brooks / Mary Cockrill vs Michael Hamlett / Susan Doninger Greer3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-17vs Lo.Hatlen55MWon 10
W#2 DoublesEd Brown / Mollie Hodl vs Mark Osborn / Sherrie Lefere7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2025-07-09vs Je.Monaghen55MWon 10
W#2 DoublesBill Francis / Anna Koltchagova vs Daphne Driscoll / Christopher Bricker6-1, 6-0
2025-06-18vs Je.Chaffin55MLost 01
L#1 DoublesCharles George / Anna Koltchagova vs John Dunn / Sandra Rhoades4-6, 1-6
2025-06-11vs Je.Madia55MLost 01
L#2 DoublesBill Francis / Mollie Hodl vs Laura Hiller / Scott Riley4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Charles George
published 4
3.82
Mollie Hodl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Bill Francis
published 4
3.78
3.64
3.60
3.57
Kep Paylor
published
3.56
Carol Lekan
published 4
3.53
Ed Brown
published 4
3.44
Anna Koltchagova
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.28
Holly Camak
published 3.5
3.12
Mary Cockrill
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
Keith Satisky
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charles George
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Mollie Hodl
76W–49L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Bill Francis
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Elizabeth Hensley
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.78
Larry Gregory Williams
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Isabelle Homes Gesher
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Kep Paylor
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.57
4
Carol Lekan
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Ed Brown
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.53
4
Anna Koltchagova
182W–161L career · 2 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Holly Camak
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Mary Cockrill
61W–96L career · 8 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
Keith Satisky
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.