Teams

Elings-Racqueteers

Mixed Doubles 40 & Over - SB · SB-7.0 Mixed 40 & Over

15 players · average NTRP 3.60 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-06-15vs COAC-Mighty OaksLost 01
L#1 DoublesInna Taranchenko / James Aviani vs Nancy Marden / Jason Marden6-7, 1-6
2024-06-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesInna Taranchenko / Eli Katz vs Richard Nagy / Katie Zimmerman6-1, 7-6
2024-05-04vs COAC-Mighty OaksLost 01
L#1 DoublesInna Taranchenko / Eli Katz vs Deborah Babineau / Mark LaCommare3-6, 3-6
2024-04-27vs Alisal-RancherosLost 01
L#1 DoublesInna Taranchenko / Scott Kaufman vs Adam Haws / Jennifer Sorensen3-6, 1-6
2024-04-20vs COAC-TsunamisWon 10
W#3 DoublesJose Casillas / Inna Taranchenko vs Lori Travis / Chris Agh6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SB-7.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Andreana Jones
published 4
3.68
Ryan Chambers
published
3.30
Inna Taranchenko
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Chris Conkling
published 3.5
Doyle Hollister
published 3.5
3.22
Lori Akers
published
3.18
James Aviani
published 3.5
Beth Katz
published
Eli Katz
published
Joey Benaron
published
Jose Casillas
published
Pamela Westlund
published
Penny Wolfe
published
Scott Kaufman
published
Veronica Buck-Tomm
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Chambers + Veronica Buck-Tomm1640% gamesnot enough data
Inna Taranchenko + Joey Benaron4161% gamesnot enough data
Inna Taranchenko + Ryan Chambers303 matchesnot enough data
Inna Taranchenko + Jose Casillas213 matchesnot enough data
Penny Wolfe + Jose Casillas123 matchesnot enough data
Penny Wolfe + Joey Benaron123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andreana Jones
29W–20L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
Ryan Chambers
19W–11L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Inna Taranchenko
104W–67L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Chris Conkling
2W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Doyle Hollister
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lori Akers
13W–21L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
James Aviani
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
Beth Katz
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Eli Katz
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Joey Benaron
18W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jose Casillas
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Pamela Westlund
6W–17L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Penny Wolfe
6W–22L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott Kaufman
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Veronica Buck-Tomm
2W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.