Teams

SD 3.5 Mtn View/ Padilla

2023 SoCal Fall Doubles- SD WD · SD - Women - 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.42 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-11-28vs SD LLW 3.5 Coronado TC/ KimballSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSylvia Devoe / CRISTINA CORONA vs Frida Kalach / Debora Rozen3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAna Eliza Valencia / Cynthia Hensersky vs Jessica Cunningham / Megan West6-4, 7-5
2023-11-02vs SD 3.5 SDTRC/ MonzonLost 01
L#3 DoublesSylvia Devoe / Aida Padilla vs Donna Dube / Naomi Gallego3-6, 3-6
2023-10-26Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCynthia Hensersky / Aida Padilla vs Christy Ward / Kari Ursitti4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMarcela Dongo / CRISTINA CORONA vs Joan Fahrenthold / Heather Grimes3-6, 3-6
2023-10-12vs SD 3.5 SDTRC/ PeinadoWon 10
W#3 DoublesAna Eliza Valencia / Aida Padilla vs Marva Gesell / Donna Fitzsimmons6-2, 6-3
2023-09-28vs SD 3.5 La Jolla B&TC/ PattersonLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Shirley / Cynthia Hensersky vs Kristen Patterson / Sarah Suiter4-6, 1-6
2023-09-14vs SD 3.5 Peninsula TC/ LightnerWon 10
W#2 DoublesMer Chiodo / Cynthia Hensersky vs Susan Schraeder / Christine Truong6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Tenley Gritts
published
3.63
3.49
Cintya Palomares
published 3.5
3.42
Lisa Shirley
published
3.24
Mer Chiodo
published
3.23
Cynthia Hensersky
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.96
2.86
Michele Kelley
published
2.69
CRISTINA CORONA
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.56
Aida Padilla
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aida Padilla + Tenley Gritts4249% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tenley Gritts
6W–14L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Ana Eliza Valencia
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Cintya Palomares
7W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
Lisa Shirley
18W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.42
Mer Chiodo
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Cynthia Hensersky
43W–46L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Frances Simpson Lang
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.96
Michele Kelley
12W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
CRISTINA CORONA
43W–41L career · 5 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Aida Padilla
54W–135L career · 3 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.