Teams

Long-Batchelor/Fayetteville/FAC

2025 Adult 40 & Over Spring League 2.5-4.0 · 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 2.90 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-10vs LeMaster/Bentonville/KTCWon 31
W#1 SinglesJenna Donnell vs Jennifer Beasley6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNastassja Riley / Kelly Johnson vs Angela Paulk / Teri Malies6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSamantha Thiede Erickson / Deena Fitzgerald vs Eve LeMaster / Dawn Tomescko6-4, 6-4
L#4 DoublesShawna Ernst / Lindsay Capps vs Wendy Zapp / Dawn Adams3-6, 2-6
2025-05-06vs Hanus/Rogers/PCCSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSamantha Thiede Erickson / Deena Fitzgerald vs Karen Light / Diane Young6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBrandy Long / Aysa Galbraith vs Dondi Sanders / Tiziana Guptan6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNora Cooper / Lindsay Capps vs Jeanne Washburn / Kimberly Larsen4-6, 6-7
L#4 DoublesJenna Donnell / Kelly Johnson vs Silvia Azrai / Taylor Holley3-6, 2-6
2025-04-30vs Meullenet-Hodges/Fayetteville/SRCLost 14
L#1 DoublesLyndsey Weber / Nastassja Riley vs Becca Bertram / Lisa Hufford2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJenna Donnell vs Natalie Mayer2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDeena Fitzgerald / Nora Cooper vs Sherry Carpenter / Kaye Collier2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMisti Lira / Shawna Ernst vs Leigh Verucchi / Helen Urban0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#4 DoublesAysa Galbraith / Samantha Thiede Erickson vs Connie Stewart / Jennifer Meldrum6-3, 6-2
2025-04-06vs Schutz-Larimer/Springdale/SRCLost 01
L#4 DoublesShawna Ernst / Cheryl Williams vs Andi Douglas / MJ Schutz3-6, 1-6
2025-03-13vs Schmitt-Carr/Rogers/MRCLost 13
L#1 DoublesDeena Fitzgerald / Shawna Ernst vs Laura Schmitt / Debbie Carr1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesBrandy Long vs Samantha Neel6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSamantha Thiede Erickson / Jenna Donnell vs Margie Story / Melissa Smith4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLyndsey Weber / Nastassja Riley vs Stephanie Lightle / Tracy McRae6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-03-09vs Fitzgerald/Rogers/MRCLost 01
L#4 DoublesCheryl Williams / Lindsay Capps vs kimberly cadle / Heather Gross3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#4 DoublesShawna Ernst / Cheryl Williams vs Cezanne Garlinghouse / Candace Siebenmorgen1-6, 4-6
2025-02-23vs Balasekaran/Rogers/SVCCWon 32
W#1 DoublesLyndsey Weber / Nastassja Riley vs Christine Harris / Lois Chun6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesSamantha Thiede Erickson vs Samantha Gagliardo7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesBrandy Long / Aysa Galbraith vs Cindy Hoehner / Christa Geduldig6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJenna Donnell / Jena Newman vs Jamie Wilson / Amy Colucci1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#4 DoublesMisti Lira / Deena Fitzgerald vs Alisha Rohlwing / Kirsten Meier4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Jenna Donnell
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.88
Aysa Galbraith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Brandy Long
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.82
Samantha Thiede Erickson
usually #1 Singles 20%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.75
Nastassja Riley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.66
Nora Cooper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.64
Jena Newman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.32
Deena Fitzgerald
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.27
Misti Lira
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.05
Cheryl Williams
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Erica Baker
published
Lindsay Capps
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Shawna Ernst
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brandy Long + Aysa Galbraith9558% games+6.7% vs expected
Nastassja Riley + Aysa Galbraith5065% gamesnot enough data
Deena Fitzgerald + Misti Lira123 matchesnot enough data
Jena Newman + Jenna Donnell033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenna Donnell
36W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Aysa Galbraith
21W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Brandy Long
28W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
Samantha Thiede Erickson
24W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
2.82
Nastassja Riley
20W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Caroline Batchelor
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nora Cooper
14W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%13%87%
2.66
Jena Newman
13W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64
3
Deena Fitzgerald
3W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.32
Misti Lira
12W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Cheryl Williams
4W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Erica Baker
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lindsay Capps
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shawna Ernst
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.