Teams

ROUND HILL CC CW6.5A

2024 COMBO · Women 6.5

23 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Laura Dommes
published
3.37
Kara Chizever
published
3.36
3.26
Suzanne Peck
published
3.25
Heather Paquette
published
3.19
Sarah Shapiro
published
3.19
Christine Reiners
published 3.5
3.17
Michaela Katari
published
3.13
Lea Baldacci
published
3.13
Rebecca Bergman
published
3.13
Mihaela Farnholtz
published
3.10
Julie Takano-Peters
published
3.00
Mickie Kerr
published
2.97
Kerry Maunus
published
2.95
2.73
Christy Watson
published 3
2.70
Tara Preston
published
2.66
Kristi Carter
published
2.66
Raylinn Bianchi
published
2.59
Maria Angel-Ordonez
published
2.43
Rene Zocchi
published
Julie Peloquin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mickie Kerr + Julie Takano-Peters224 matchesnot enough data
Heather Paquette + Christine Reiners134 matchesnot enough data
Heather Paquette + Suzanne Peck123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Dommes
11W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.37
Kara Chizever
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Caroline D Sherbourne
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.36
Suzanne Peck
14W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
Heather Paquette
20W–29L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Sarah Shapiro
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Christine Reiners
13W–19L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Michaela Katari
46W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%11%89%
3.17
Lea Baldacci
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.13
Rebecca Bergman
13W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%17%83%
3.13
Mihaela Farnholtz
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.13
Julie Takano-Peters
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%23%77%
3.10
Mickie Kerr
11W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.00
Kerry Maunus
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Andrea Bryan-Grout
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Christy Watson
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%2%
2.73
Tara Preston
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
2.70
Kristi Carter
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66
Raylinn Bianchi
8W–14L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66
Maria Angel-Ordonez
13W–22L career · no lines in 2024
0%26%74%
2.59
Rene Zocchi
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
2.43
Hilary Andersen Hurlbut
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Julie Peloquin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.