Teams

Fendler, Kathleen

2026 HOA Adult 40 & Over Daytime League 3.0 - 4.5 · 4.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 4.30 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-03-10vs Sims, NikkiLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarmen Kowalski / Amanda Thomley Marsh vs Michelle Bettis / Cynthia Kuhlman5-7, 1-3
L#2 DoublesKandice Thurman / Brook Vitt vs Pamela Kopplin / Nikki Sims6-4, 2-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDina Mitchell / Kathleen Fendler vs Jenny Arbanas / Julie Green6-4, 6-4
2026-03-03vs Norman, PhyllisLost 04
L#1 DoublesKandice Thurman / Elizabeth Roberts vs Erin Gustafson / Jill Burgdorfer2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesBrook Vitt vs Alli Gershon0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Taber / Micah Schloegel vs Phyllis Norman / Thresa Lampe2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMary Sandefur / Margaret Pugh vs Christina Gassen / Sara Maguire3-6, 3-6
2026-02-24vs Fangman, AmyWon 40
W#1 DoublesJennifer Hill / Amanda Thomley Marsh vs Amy Fangman / Mindy Stewart2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCarmen Kowalski vs Rhonda Bonner7-6, 5-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKandice Thurman / Courtney Root vs Jennifer Byers / Carol Creel6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMary Sandefur / Kathleen Fendler vs Jamie Esser / Dawna McCulloch6-7, 5-1, 1-0
2026-02-17vs Sims, NikkiWon 40
W#1 DoublesDina Mitchell / Karen Davis vs Teresa Scanlon / Janice Price6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCarmen Kowalski vs Wesley Bush6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKathleen Fendler / Brook Vitt vs Anne Cusser / Jennifer Fallon6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCourtney Root / Kandice Thurman vs Cynthia Kuhlman / Nikki Sims6-2, 7-6
2026-02-10vs Norman, PhyllisLost 12
L#1 DoublesDina Mitchell / Micah Schloegel vs Erin Gustafson / Betsy Weber3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesCarmen Kowalski vs Alli Gershon1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Davis / Sarah Taber vs Blerina Boci / Ola Vaughn6-4, 4-2
2026-02-03vs Fangman, AmyWon 40
W#1 DoublesJennifer Hill / Kandice Thurman vs Jamie Esser / Carolyn Huffman6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCarmen Kowalski vs Rhonda Bonner6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSarah Ross / Micah Schloegel vs Carol Creel / Jennifer Byers6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMargaret Pugh / Mary Sandefur vs Dawna McCulloch / Mindy Stewart6-3, 6-2
2026-01-27vs Sims, NikkiLost 12
W#1 DoublesMicah Schloegel / Sarah Taber vs Janice Price / Teresa Scanlon6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Roberts / Courtney Root vs Stacey Craft / Nikki Sims5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKathleen Fendler / Kandice Thurman vs Shelley O'Brien / Chriss Shoup-Duntz7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-01-21vs Norman, PhyllisLost 13
W#1 DoublesKandice Thurman / Jennifer Hill vs Phyllis Norman / Ola Vaughn7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesBrook Vitt vs Alli Gershon0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCarmen Kowalski / Sarah Ross vs Jessie Gregory / Betsy Weber4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMargaret Pugh / Mary Sandefur vs Jackie Gehrke / Jackie Stahl1-6, 1-6
2026-01-13vs Fangman, AmyWon 21
L#1 DoublesMicah Schloegel / Dina Mitchell vs Rhonda Bonner / Michelle Terriquez1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCarmen Kowalski / Kandice Thurman vs Amy Fangman / Romy Carlson6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCourtney Root / Elizabeth Roberts vs Dawna McCulloch / Jamie Esser7-5, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Karen Davis
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.04
Carmen Kowalski
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.91
Elizabeth Roberts
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.91
Brook Vitt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
3.86
Kandice Thurman
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.85
Courtney Root
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.85
Sarah Taber
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.82
Amanda Thomley Marsh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.81
Sally McEntyre
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.80
Micah Schloegel
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.76
Dina Mitchell
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.70
Ashley Schubert
published 4
3.65
Kathleen Fendler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.64
Margaret Pugh
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.62
Sarah Ross
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.62
Mary Sandefur
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Jennifer Hill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Micah Schloegel + Sarah Ross8363% games+17.3% vs expected
Carmen Kowalski + Sarah Ross3354% games+16.2% vs expected
Mary Sandefur + Kathleen Fendler8460% games+16.1% vs expected
Micah Schloegel + Kathleen Fendler7459% games+13.3% vs expected
Kandice Thurman + Kathleen Fendler6458% games+11.6% vs expected
Courtney Root + Kandice Thurman7167% games+11.4% vs expected
Micah Schloegel + Sally McEntyre10657% games+10.5% vs expected
Kandice Thurman + Sally McEntyre6359% games+8.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Davis
52W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
4.12
4.5
Carmen Kowalski
53W–40L career · 7 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
4.04
Elizabeth Roberts
111W–66L career · 4 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
3.91
4.5
Brook Vitt
106W–88L career · 4 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
3.91
Kandice Thurman
133W–64L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Courtney Root
112W–61L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.85
Sarah Taber
68W–60L career · 3 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
3.85
4.5
Amanda Thomley Marsh
21W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
90%10%<1%
3.82
Sally McEntyre
39W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Micah Schloegel
84W–43L career · 9 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
Dina Mitchell
154W–77L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.76
4
Ashley Schubert
23W–7L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
Kathleen Fendler
93W–47L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.65
Margaret Pugh
38W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.64
Sarah Ross
62W–43L career · 8 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.62
Mary Sandefur
89W–45L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.62
Jennifer Hill
27W–21L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.