Teams

CROW CANYON CC 40AM4.0A

2024 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.69 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#3 DoublesVishal Shenoy / John Riley vs Vikram Kadi / Sunny Singh3-6, 0-6
2024-03-10vs PLEASANTON 40AM4.0ALost 01
L#3 DoublesDarren Rashkin / Vishal Shenoy vs Vishal Saboo / Paul Lizama1-6, 4-6
2024-02-26vs GREENBROOK RS 40AM4.0ALost 01
L#3 DoublesDean Christman / Vishal Shenoy vs Jeff Burrill / Kaarthik Natarajhan6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2024-02-25vs PLEASANTON 40AM4.0EWon 10
W#3 DoublesDarren Rashkin / Vishal Shenoy vs Hosoon Ku / Xin Zhou7-5, 6-1
2024-02-18vs DOUGHERTY VALLEY HS 40AM4.0ALost 01
L#3 DoublesVishal Shenoy / Steve Heninger vs Krishna Shanmugam / SACHIDANAND ALLE2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Greg Millington
published 4
3.69
Jim Kruger
published
3.68
Dennis Mcsweeney
published 4
3.66
Priyank Saxena
published
3.59
Sean Baker
published
3.40
Vishal Shenoy
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.40
Chad Harrison
published 3.5
3.30
Steve Heninger
published 3.5
3.25
Dean Christman
published 3.5
3.04
Darren Rashkin
published 3.5
Ryan Semmelmeyer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Heninger + Vishal Shenoy131152% games+4.4% vs expected
Jim Kruger + Priyank Saxena123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Fierro-Peretti
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.95
4
Greg Millington
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jim Kruger
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Dennis Mcsweeney
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
Priyank Saxena
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.66
Sean Baker
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.59
3.5
Vishal Shenoy
63W–56L career · 15 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Chad Harrison
5W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Steve Heninger
52W–50L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Dean Christman
13W–12L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Darren Rashkin
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.04
Ryan Semmelmeyer
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.