Teams

JTC - Zaldivar/Demopolus

2024 Alachua Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed 40 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.06 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesJonathan Taffe / Cassie Johnson vs Jorge Torres-Vazquez / Lisa Booth5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJerome Valencia / Maria Zaldivar vs Angie Gomez / June Navarro1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSilvia Menendez / Jonathan Taffe vs Jodi Cox / Joseph Cox IV2-6, 6-7
2024-02-11vs DB - Haager/FoxWon 10
W#2 DoublesCassie Johnson / Jonathan Taffe vs Adam Lites / Kelly Haager6-4, 6-4
2024-01-28vs JTC - LancasterWon 10
W#2 DoublesCassie Johnson / Jonathan Taffe vs Rachael Seidler / Yoonsuk Park6-0, 7-6
2024-01-21vs DB - Haager/FoxSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJonathan Taffe / Margaret Zerbe vs Danielle McGriff / Dieter Haager3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMaria Zaldivar / George Demopoulos vs Hebah Fox / Hari Parvataneni6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Chris Cochran
published 3.5
3.06
Jonathan Taffe
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.00
2.98
Aaron Kelley
published 3
2.97
Cassie Johnson
published 3
2.89
Marisa Rodriguez
published
2.88
Jeff Fox
published
2.85
Margaret Zerbe
published 3
2.79
Colleen Anderson
published 3
2.76
Linda Vaughn
published
2.67
Sriyani Dissanayake
published
2.57
Maria Zaldivar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Silvia Menendez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

George Demopoulos + Cassie Johnson224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chris Cochran
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Jonathan Taffe
82W–34L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.06
3
George Demopoulos
21W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Aaron Kelley
16W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Cassie Johnson
21W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
Marisa Rodriguez
28W–26L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.89
Jeff Fox
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Margaret Zerbe
27W–40L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Colleen Anderson
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
2.79
Linda Vaughn
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
2.76
Sriyani Dissanayake
2W–11L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.67
3
Maria Zaldivar
90W–150L career · 4 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
2.57
Silvia Menendez
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.