Teams

BTA-C RED

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-17vs MEA GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesAndrea Barsch / Megan Rudolph vs Gia Medeiros / Colleen Harvey4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKate Resnick vs Kristine Miller2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMonica Mortenson / Melissa Karch vs Annika Paradise / Allison Shors6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTeresa Chapman / Emily Koechel vs Keryn Schneider / Shannon Ross5-7, 4-6
2023-07-10vs BCC BLUELost 13
W#1 DoublesAndrea Barsch / Christy Valentine vs Juliana Cohen / Anna Bertagnolli6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJacqueline Rosains vs Anna Mark0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMegan Rudolph / Melissa Karch vs Kristin Kalush / Sarah Mills6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKathleen Fitzcallaghan / Monica Mortenson vs Linda Mounce / Xenia Rutherford3-6, 3-6
2023-07-03vs CVTA ORANGEWon 31
W#1 DoublesAndrea Barsch / Megan Rudolph vs Nancy Johnson / Cathy Hawley6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesTeresa Chapman vs Courtney Messenbaugh3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathleen Fitzcallaghan / Monica Mortenson vs Katherine Snow / Kathleen Hein6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesEmily Koechel / Jacqueline Rosains vs Karla Scornavacco / Diane Hunt6-2, 6-1
2023-06-27vs CVTA TEALSplit 22
L#1 DoublesChristy Valentine / Kathleen Fitzcallaghan vs Louise Fowler / Jennifer Dingman3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMelissa Karch vs Alia Ghandour4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMonica Mortenson / Patricia Henke vs Maggie Brubaker / Nancy Stern4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesEmily Koechel / Megan Rudolph vs Maril Davenport / Kendra Tupper6-1, 6-1
2023-06-26vs BRMST REDLost 13
W#1 DoublesAndrea Barsch / Kate Resnick vs Karen Gallo / Pam Decker7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesPatricia Henke vs Kathleen Connell1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMonica Mortenson / Melissa Karch vs Sharla Prom / Lori Claussen5-2
L#3 DoublesTeresa Chapman / Jacqueline Rosains vs Shelli Fazzini / Sarah Hertzenberg0-6, 2-6
2023-06-14vs LTA-Q GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesChristy Valentine / Andrea Barsch vs Erika Cistone / Krystal Thomas6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKathleen Fitzcallaghan vs Kristi Mark6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKate Resnick / Patricia Henke vs Tammy Duerksen / Lindsay Roland6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesTeresa Chapman / Emily Koechel vs Karen BRADY / Rebecca Upthegrove6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Christy Valentine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Andrea Barsch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.05
Kate Resnick
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Megan Rudolph
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.84
Monica Mortenson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Emily Koechel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Melissa Karch
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.50
Jacqueline Rosains
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.49
Teresa Chapman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Kathleen Fitzcallaghan
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Patricia Henke
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kate Resnick + Monica Mortenson5169% games+12.1% vs expected
Kate Resnick + Megan Rudolph6071% games+11.8% vs expected
Christy Valentine + Andrea Barsch10171% games+8.3% vs expected
Monica Mortenson + Kathleen Fitzcallaghan3548% games+3.3% vs expected
Christy Valentine + Megan Rudolph10654% games+2.0% vs expected
Megan Rudolph + Andrea Barsch4258% games+0.5% vs expected
Monica Mortenson + Megan Rudolph4450% games−1.5% vs expected
Emily Koechel + Monica Mortenson2443% games−6.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christy Valentine
45W–47L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
3
Andrea Barsch
68W–34L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.07
Kate Resnick
45W–24L career · 3 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.05
3
Megan Rudolph
55W–32L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Monica Mortenson
62W–40L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Emily Koechel
17W–42L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Melissa Karch
19W–26L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
2.5
Jacqueline Rosains
13W–44L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%51%49%
2.50
Teresa Chapman
7W–42L career · 4 lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
2.49
Kathleen Fitzcallaghan
15W–44L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Patricia Henke
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.