Teams

Duval/Radel

2025 Duval Combo 50 & Over Summer · 7.5 M Weds Eve

13 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-17vs Eagle Harbor PinkermanWon 20
W#2 DoublesBrad Mossman / Hai Cao vs Tim Fritz / Mike Bruno4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTony Hennies / Chuck King vs Thomas Keller / Brad Robinson6-4, 6-4
2025-09-15vs Julington Creek Carr 50 7.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesRobert Radel / Jowell Olson vs John Callihan / Mike Rhodes6-3, 7-5
2025-09-03vs Julington Creek Carr 50 7.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesBrian McIntire / Jowell Olson vs Patrick Kincaid / Chris Carr4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-09-01vs Julington Creek Carr 50 7.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesBrad Mossman / Chuck King vs John Callihan / James ODwyer6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJames Estigoy / Jowell Olson vs Patrick Kincaid / Mike Rhodes6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesTony Hennies / Greg Burley vs Jeff Prieto / Pedro Enrique Kreitz Martinez3-6
2025-08-27vs Eagle Harbor PinkermanLost 01
L#3 DoublesChuck King / Jowell Olson vs Johnny Broyles / Matt Hutto2-6, 5-7
2025-08-11vs Baymeadows Gordon 50Won 10
W#2 DoublesMichael Alden / Jowell Olson vs Chris Taylor / Stephen Bennett6-4, 6-1
2025-07-16vs Eagle Harbor PinkermanWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrian McIntire / Jowell Olson vs Jim Pinkerman / Tim Fritz6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 M Weds Eve have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Brad Mossman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.93
Tony Hennies
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.80
Brian McIntire
published 4
3.69
Matt Ausherman
published
3.63
Michael Alden
published
3.46
Robert Radel
published
3.42
Jowell Olson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Rob DeJesus
published
3.21
Ben Landis
published 3.5
Greg Burley
published
Hai Cao
published
James Estigoy
published
Pacifico Rejas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ben Landis + Rob DeJesus314 matchesnot enough data
Jowell Olson + Hai Cao303 matchesnot enough data
Jowell Olson + Brian McIntire123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brad Mossman
77W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.02
4
Tony Hennies
97W–48L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Brian McIntire
12W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.80
Matt Ausherman
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Michael Alden
13W–2L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
Robert Radel
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.46
Jowell Olson
43W–36L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Rob DeJesus
11W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
Ben Landis
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Greg Burley
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Hai Cao
10W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
James Estigoy
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pacifico Rejas
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.