Teams

Try Get'm In

2022 Ekolu League · 6.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / EAST HAWAII

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-10-30vs Kimi's 6.0Lost 02
L#1 Female DoublesLynn Hatada / Karen Dodo vs Yuko Uehana / Michele Lefebvre6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 Mixed DoublesDarnella Villanueva / Brian Koge vs Terri Inouye / Trang Trang4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-10-25vs Tennis PotatoesLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesDarnella Villanueva / Lynn Hatada vs Mei Ceria / Tomoko Sakishima6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2022-10-16vs VoltWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesDiane Noda / Darnella Villanueva vs Kerri Okamura / Toni Sakai-Kawada6-4
2022-10-14vs VoltWon 10
W#1 Mixed DoublesLynn Hatada / T Kelly McCloskey vs Lester Oshiro / Jocelyn Cortez6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-09-03vs Tennis PotatoesLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesLynn Hatada / Darnella Villanueva vs Sherlyn Aronce / Tomoko Sakishima6-3, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Tennis Potatoes8022211157
2Volt53141025209
3Kimi's 6.044111331226
4Try Get'm In2681637230
5Just For Fun1751940249

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Izutsu
published 3.5
Diane Noda
published 3.5
3.04
Lynn Hatada
usually #1 Female Doubles 71%, also #1 Mixed Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.96
Michael Marshall
published
2.82
Darnella Villanueva
usually #1 Female Doubles 75%, also #1 Mixed Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
Rebecca Marshall
published
2.63
Thomas Geballe
published
2.62
Brian Koge
published 3
2.54
Julie Iida
published
T Kelly McCloskey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Koge + Michael Marshall134 matchesnot enough data
Lynn Hatada + Darnella Villanueva033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrew Izutsu
11W–41L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Diane Noda
43W–34L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Lynn Hatada
60W–143L career · 7 lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
Michael Marshall
53W–97L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.96
3
Darnella Villanueva
96W–136L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
Rebecca Marshall
43W–61L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
Thomas Geballe
33W–72L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Brian Koge
10W–96L career · no lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
2.62
3
Andre-Nicolas Chene
9W–18L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
2.54
Julie Iida
31W–63L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
T Kelly McCloskey
4W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.