Teams

Avengers

2023 18&Over Men · 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.92 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-17vs Drumlins - SchormanWon 21
W#1 DoublesJason Lam / Ryu Kim vs Peer Soderberg / Kyle Voyer6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesBrett Sullivan vs Peter Rigby6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRobert Auler / Marc Hann vs Kyle Schorman / Bong Gee Jang6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2023-07-10vs Drumlins - SchormanWon 20
W#1 SinglesBrett Sullivan vs Michael DeLaney6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMick Rouse vs Peter Rigby6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-26vs Drumlins - SchormanWon 31
W#1 DoublesJackson Bradley / Marc Hann vs Richard Hartwell / Bong Gee Jang6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesMick Rouse vs David Fenner4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRyu Kim / Karl Offen vs David Fernando / Kyle Voyer7-6, 7-5
W#2 SinglesBrett Sullivan vs Michael DeLaney6-2, 6-3
2023-06-19vs Drumlins - SchormanLost 03
L#1 DoublesJason Lam / Ryu Kim vs Bong Gee Jang / David Fenner6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesWonhee Cho vs David Fernando2-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesMarc Hann vs Michael DeLaney7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-12vs Drumlins - SchormanSplit 22
L#1 DoublesRobert Auler / William Barry vs Peer Soderberg / Ethan Westfall1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesBrett Sullivan vs Bong Gee Jang6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJackson Bradley / Ryu Kim vs Peter Rigby / Richard Hartwell5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesWonhee Cho vs Michael DeLaney3-6, 4-6
2023-06-05vs Drumlins - SchormanWon 31
W#1 DoublesJason Lam / Brian Emigholz vs Kyle Schorman / Michael DeLaney6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMick Rouse vs David Fernando7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJoon Young Kim / Ryu Kim vs Richard Hartwell / Bong Gee Jang5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesWonhee Cho vs Peer Soderberg4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Avengers42131125228
2Drumlins - Schorman24111329250

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Joon Young Kim
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.95
Brian Emigholz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.92
Brett Sullivan
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
3.64
Jackson Bradley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Patrick Brown
published 4
3.60
Marc Hann
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.50
Robert Auler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.37
Karl Offen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.33
HANSEOK KIM
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jason Lam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mick Rouse
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Ryu Kim
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
William Barry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Wonhee Cho
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brett Sullivan + Jackson Bradley3254% games+21.8% vs expected
Brian Emigholz + Jackson Bradley7354% games+8.7% vs expected
Brian Emigholz + Robert Auler11955% games−1.2% vs expected
Robert Auler + Jackson Bradley2744% games−5.9% vs expected
Brian Emigholz + Joon Young Kim8159% gamesnot enough data
Brett Sullivan + Brian Emigholz134 matchesnot enough data
Robert Auler + Joon Young Kim314 matchesnot enough data
Jackson Bradley + Marc Hann213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joon Young Kim
118W–32L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
4.25
4
Brian Emigholz
89W–69L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.95
4.5
Brett Sullivan
12W–18L career · type A · 10 lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
3.92
4
Jackson Bradley
141W–81L career · 8 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Patrick Brown
37W–25L career · type S · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.64
Marc Hann
15W–18L career · 6 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.60
Robert Auler
47W–67L career · 2 lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.50
3.5
Karl Offen
53W–59L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
HANSEOK KIM
41W–41L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.33
Jason Lam
32W–6L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mick Rouse
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ryu Kim
26W–12L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
William Barry
8W–15L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Wonhee Cho
32W–12L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.