Teams

LBoesch-YMCA

2025 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 5.0 Women Evening

13 players · average NTRP 4.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-30vs HRemley-ENOSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAnastasiya Manet vs MaryBeth Jackson6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLaura Alvarez / Emily Callahan vs Paula Fernandez-Pita / Jennifer McEntee1-6, 3-6
2025-04-23vs HRemley-ENOWon 21
W#1 DoublesMadeline Brown / Tiffany Holbrook vs Paula Fernandez-Pita / Nena Marks6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesPaula Collado Cordon vs Anna Walter6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLeslie Boesch / Ivette Duran vs Anne Frautschi / Emily Tinervin5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-16vs HRemley-ENOWon 30
W#1 DoublesAngelina Neiberger / Heidi Steiber vs Anne Frautschi / Jennifer McEntee7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMadeline Brown vs Tanita Tedamrongwanish6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPaula Collado Cordon / Ivette Duran vs Emily Tinervin / Amanda Linke6-1, 6-2
2025-04-09vs HRemley-ENOWon 21
L#1 DoublesPaula Collado Cordon / Anastasiya Manet vs Heather Remley / Nena Marks6-7, 6-0, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLaura Alvarez vs Paula Fernandez-Pita6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeidi Steiber / Tiffany Holbrook vs Jennifer Moore / Tanita Tedamrongwanish6-2, 6-3
2025-04-02vs HRemley-ENOLost 12
W#1 DoublesMadeline Brown / Paige Lloyd vs Elizabeth Hodges / MaryBeth Jackson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesIvette Duran vs Anna Walter3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAngelina Neiberger / Emily Callahan vs Paula Fernandez-Pita / Jennifer McEntee2-6, 1-6
2025-03-26vs HRemley-ENOLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnastasiya Manet / Heidi Steiber vs Nena Marks / Emily Tinervin2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesPaula Collado Cordon vs Elizabeth Hodges6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAngelina Neiberger / Ivette Duran vs Kelly Moler Glass / Tanita Tedamrongwanish0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-19vs HRemley-ENOWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulia Howard / Paula Collado Cordon vs Emily Tinervin / Jennifer Moore6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAngelina Neiberger vs Amanda Linke6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHeidi Steiber / Laura Alvarez vs Anne Frautschi / Susanne Zuniga3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-03-12vs HRemley-ENOWon 21
W#1 DoublesAngelina Neiberger / Paula Collado Cordon vs Anna Walter / Amanda Linke0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMadeline Brown vs Nena Marks2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHeidi Steiber / Ivette Duran vs Tanita Tedamrongwanish / MaryBeth Jackson2-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 18 & Over Adult 5.0 Women Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LBoesch-YMCA53141026205

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.47 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.76
Heidi Steiber
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 5
4.74
Madeline Brown
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.71
Laura Alvarez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.69
Anastasiya Manet
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 5
4.54
Ivette Duran
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 5
4.44
Paula Collado Cordon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 5
4.43
Leslie Boesch
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.42
Angelina Neiberger
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.34
Brandy Kmiec
published 4.5
4.33
Julia Howard
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
4.26
Tiffany Holbrook
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
4.00
Emily Callahan
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 4.5
Paige Lloyd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Boesch + Julia Howard224 matchesnot enough data
Anastasiya Manet + Paula Collado Cordon033 matchesnot enough data
Paula Collado Cordon + Julia Howard303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Heidi Steiber
16W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
4.76
Madeline Brown
14W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
4.74
Laura Alvarez
15W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.71
5
Anastasiya Manet
32W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.69
5
Ivette Duran
7W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
4.54
5
Paula Collado Cordon
64W–56L career · 6 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
4.44
4.5
Leslie Boesch
245W–102L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
4.43
4.5
Angelina Neiberger
5W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
4.42
4.5
Brandy Kmiec
107W–55L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
4.34
Julia Howard
14W–8L career · 8 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
4.33
Tiffany Holbrook
22W–6L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Emily Callahan
10W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
4.00
Paige Lloyd
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.