← Teams

CGM-Kropp

2024 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.41 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Nenette Olson
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.39
Cheryl Geisler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
John Hapke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Karl Kropp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Ray Baxter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Vicki Blunt
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.13
ALFREDO ALANIS
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.99
Donna Baxter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.76
ROSY ALANIS
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.76
Shannon Lucas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Mike Olson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3
Results7 ties
2024-03-09Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMike Olson / Nenette Olson vs Eric Ayers / Jane King Ayers6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMark Muckerheide / ROSY ALANIS vs Christian Paulsen / Jane Paulsen6-4, 6-0
2024-03-03Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesNenette Olson / Mike Olson vs Jeff Lipke / Ann Skoog6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCheryl Geisler / Charles Hahn vs Daniel M Kim / Jennifer Potter6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesROSY ALANIS / ALFREDO ALANIS vs Richard Jennings / Tracey Hodgson6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2024-03-02Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesMike Olson / Nenette Olson vs Andalib Khan / Anita Rockwell6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesROSY ALANIS / ALFREDO ALANIS vs PHAT Lee / Thu Truong6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRay Baxter / Donna Baxter vs Sev Flores / Debbie Spitzer6-2, 6-3
2024-02-17Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesMike Olson / Nenette Olson vs Michael Lavios / Natasha Rinard6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesALFREDO ALANIS / ROSY ALANIS vs Jerome Deluz / Nora Semonsen6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKarl Kropp / Bernice Zhang vs Kristi Vargas / Paul Best6-1, 6-4
2024-02-10Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesVicki Blunt / John Hapke vs Debbie Frankel / Eric Schniewind7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDonna Baxter / Ray Baxter vs Nicole Floyd / John Boelling3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesROSY ALANIS / ALFREDO ALANIS vs Betty Roux / Todd Carris6-3, 6-3
2024-01-19Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesVicki Blunt / Mark Muckerheide vs Robin Burak / Kevin Muck5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDonna Baxter / Ray Baxter vs Dean Gaylor / Teresa Darling6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesROSY ALANIS / ALFREDO ALANIS vs Patrick Clancy / Julie Gorecki6-2, 7-5
2024-01-07Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesCheryl Geisler / John Hapke vs Rachel Novak / Stefano Cavallucci6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNenette Olson / Mike Olson vs Melissa Light / Tim Janes3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesShannon Lucas / Ray Baxter vs Joy Kolesnikoff / Adam Rainey6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Nenette Olson
122W–164L career
2%98%0%
3.71
3.5
Cheryl Geisler
124W–100L career
0%97%3%
3.39
3.5
John Hapke
81W–77L career
0%97%2%
3.32
3.5
Karl Kropp
11W–28L career
4%94%2%
3.25
3.5
Ray Baxter
7W–22L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Vicki Blunt
89W–109L career
2%98%0%
3.21
3.5
ALFREDO ALANIS
35W–53L career
8%92%0%
3.13
3.5
Donna Baxter
15W–57L career · type A
39%61%0%
2.99
3
ROSY ALANIS
43W–68L career
1%98%1%
2.76
3
Shannon Lucas
18W–12L career
1%98%1%
2.76
3
Mike Olson
68W–92L career
7%92%1%
2.70

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.