Teams

KEvans (OPRC)

2023 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-05vs WYoung/JCugliari (BCC)Split 22
L#1 DoublesMary Kay Deering / Kristine Evans vs Ami Stein / Wendi Young1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Margulis vs Kandi Jackson3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesValorie Ake / Diane Dumais vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLynn Pronier / Thanh Nga McIver vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-04vs TSanz/Coover (Charlotte Indoor)Won 30
W#1 SinglesThanh Nga McIver vs Mildred Deely7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMary Kay Deering / Elizabeth Hall vs Lu Ann Burke / Kimberly Guth6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesValorie Ake / Kristine Evans vs Terri Sanz / Donna Buchman6-1, 6-3
2023-04-27vs RHoppe (Carmel)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesThanh Nga McIver / Mary Kay Deering vs Jennifer Miralia / Dawn Whitmore3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesValorie Ake / Deborah Toomey vs Andra Norman / Ginna Tate2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKristine Evans / Lynn Pronier vs Eileen Harkins / Paris Loesch4-6, 3-6
2023-04-21vs GClarke (River Hills)Won 21
W#1 SinglesJennifer Margulis vs Carolyn Schaus6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesValorie Ake / Anne Sauls vs Jane White / Kendra Boepple1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLynn Pronier / Deborah Toomey vs Bertina Brase / Sue Jeffries6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2023-04-12vs MSchrimsher (Jeff Adams)Lost 13
W#1 DoublesValorie Ake / Courtney Sito vs Stuart Pfeifer / Jennifer Ware6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJennifer Margulis vs Kristin Davin1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLynn Pronier / Kristine Evans vs Jenny Merlo / Lisa Anderson0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Hall / Thanh Nga McIver vs Virginia Jenkins / Ashley Barton2-6, 2-6
2023-03-31vs LCraig/KMcGregor (Blakeney)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesJennifer Margulis vs Michelle Wright3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnne Sauls / Courtney Sito vs Donna DePollo / Lee Page6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKristine Evans / Diane Dumais vs Kari McGregor / Eden Serekeberhan6-1, 6-4
2023-03-20vs JCook/MWeaver (PCC)Split 22
W#1 DoublesAnne Sauls / Mary Kay Deering vs Jeannette Dye / Kimberley Eudy6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesValorie Ake vs Whitney Vineyard6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesThanh Nga McIver / Sarah Murphy vs Sara Benedict / Jamie Davies6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChristi Hart / Deborah Toomey vs Nicole Daugherty / Nancy Stenersen6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2023-03-17vs JBeal/CWitten (Gaston CC)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesJennifer Margulis vs Jessica Durham5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMary Kay Deering / Anne Sauls vs Jennifer Beal / Karen Schmit2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesValorie Ake / Diane Dumais vs Margaret MacKie / Ellen Tarry4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Christi Hart
published 4.5
4.09
Gabi Gorelick
published 4.5
3.81
Mary Kay Deering
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.79
Jennifer Margulis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.76
Elizabeth Hall
published 4
3.73
Valorie Ake
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.63
Anne Sauls
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.48
Kristine Evans
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.42
Deborah Toomey
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.41
Ellen Archer
published 3.5
3.24
Lynn Pronier
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Thanh Nga McIver
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Courtney Sito
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Toomey + Anne Sauls12262% games−0.9% vs expected
Mary Kay Deering + Jennifer Margulis5457% games−1.7% vs expected
Elizabeth Hall + Anne Sauls2543% games−2.2% vs expected
Mary Kay Deering + Valorie Ake5352% games−4.0% vs expected
Kristine Evans + Valorie Ake5749% games−11.9% vs expected
Kristine Evans + Mary Kay Deering0634% gamesnot enough data
Mary Kay Deering + Anne Sauls4258% gamesnot enough data
Thanh Nga McIver + Lynn Pronier314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christi Hart
19W–26L career · type D · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Gabi Gorelick
12W–6L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
4.09
Mary Kay Deering
105W–58L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Jennifer Margulis
79W–42L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Elizabeth Hall
17W–13L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Valorie Ake
68W–48L career · 7 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Anne Sauls
82W–44L career · 4 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.63
Kristine Evans
48W–71L career · 5 lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Deborah Toomey
127W–65L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Ellen Archer
18W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Lynn Pronier
45W–37L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Thanh Nga McIver
48W–76L career · 5 lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.16
Courtney Sito
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.