Teams

Vivante Vagabonds

2022 LeeCharlotte Mixed 40 & Over Winter · 7.0 X Saturday

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-26vs LeeChar - UTC/CampbellLost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Madean / Kathleen Head vs Dan Campbell / Sherri Campbell3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-03-12vs LeeChar - UTC/CampbellWon 10
W#2 DoublesJanet Kramer / Robert Madean vs Katina Colbert / Scott Shotwell6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-02-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Head / Robert Madean vs Guy Cicinelli / Regina Saltzman6-0, 6-0
2022-01-29vs UTC SummersLost 01
L#1 DoublesJanet Kramer / Robert Madean vs Pauline Smith / Frank Stocco3-6, 5-7
2022-01-15vs Heritage Palms BeresteckiWon 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Madean / Janet Kramer vs Susan Haffey / Mark Wood6-3, 6-4
2022-01-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Madean / Kathleen Head vs Kevin Hanna / JoAnn Hanna3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 X Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Barbara Robinson
published 3.5
3.26
Edie Schwenck
published 3.5
Colleen Larson
published 3.5
3.22
Darwin Hormann
published 3.5
2.76
Daniel Kaplan
published 3
2.75
David Beier
published 3
Janet Kramer
published
Kathleen Head
published
Robert Madean
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Russell Vanderbaan
published
Steve Larson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Russell Vanderbaan + Edie Schwenck224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Barbara Robinson
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Edie Schwenck
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Colleen Larson
1W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Darwin Hormann
0W–3L career · type M · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
3
Daniel Kaplan
3W–7L career · type M · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
3
David Beier
2W–4L career · type M · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Janet Kramer
20W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathleen Head
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lorraine Heckman Schmidt
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert Madean
25W–46L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Russell Vanderbaan
6W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Steve Larson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.