Teams

Hempfield - Covell

2021 Central Penn Tri-Level League · Womens Tri Level League

12 players · average NTRP 3.90 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2020-11-21vs Wisehaven - CriswellLost 02
L#2 DoublesBonnie Keating / Irene Acosta vs Kathy Mowrer / Nicole Nikolaus0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCaitlin Barcheski / Pamela Oleksa vs Molly Loyer / Kristine Criswell4-6, 5-7
2020-11-15vs Hempfield - HuntLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlexandra Weeber / Irene Acosta vs Kaitlin Zdilla / Madison Pipkin1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJody Wilson / Michele Mccartney vs Stephanie Seabra / Lori Hunt7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKIM FRUIN / Caitlin Barcheski vs KELLEY HERSHEY / Brandi Tait5-7, 6-7
2020-10-24vs Hershey - SoulliardLost 03
L#1 DoublesBonnie Keating / Terri Mrozinski vs Debbie Bray / Brenda McBride1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichele Mccartney / Lori Tully vs Gretchen Yarnall / Michele Harnden6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoAnne Hangen / KIM FRUIN vs Kristin Jeffries / Meg Rogers3-6, 4-6
2020-10-18vs RCW - Team TrifectaWon 21
W#1 DoublesBonnie Keating / Alexandra Weeber vs Tia Tedder / Kristin Schlageter4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichele Mccartney / Jody Wilson vs Amber Kroh / Sydney Nye7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJoAnne Hangen / KIM FRUIN vs Dorothy Stubblebine / Amanda Caporaletti5-7, 1-6
2020-10-04vs Hempfield - HufnagelLost 12
L#1 DoublesIrene Acosta / Terri Mrozinski vs Diana Yeagley / Catherine Hill4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJody Wilson / Michele Mccartney vs Tammy Miller / Sara Marian Lucking6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPamela Oleksa / Caitlin Barcheski vs Kathleen Schlager / Sharon Davis6-7, 4-6
2020-09-26vs Wisehaven - MichelsWon 30
W#1 DoublesIrene Acosta / Alexandra Weeber vs Katherine Wagner / Dale Heird6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTerri Mrozinski / Nancy Opilo vs Marianne Michels / Julie Schedin6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKIM FRUIN / JoAnne Hangen vs Lisa Frick / Jennifer Small6-2, 6-3
2020-09-19vs West Shore - TrappWon 21
L#1 DoublesIrene Acosta / Terri Mrozinski vs Laura Lanza / Jane Acquilano4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJody Wilson / Michele Mccartney vs Anna Jacobs / Carolyn Hopwood6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoAnne Hangen / Pamela Oleksa vs Lois Jernigan / Laura Malinoski4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Womens Tri Level League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Jody Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.95
Lori Tully
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.92
Alexandra Weeber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.89
Michele Mccartney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Bonnie Keating
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Nancy Opilo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Irene Acosta
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.66
Debora Covell
published 4
3.52
Caitlin Barcheski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.32
KIM FRUIN
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
JoAnne Hangen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Terri Mrozinski
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Opilo + Michele Mccartney462358% games+3.9% vs expected
Jody Wilson + Michele Mccartney42861% games+3.5% vs expected
Bonnie Keating + Terri Mrozinski726052% games+3.1% vs expected
Lori Tully + Debora Covell10660% games+3.0% vs expected
Nancy Opilo + Lori Tully331857% games+2.1% vs expected
Michele Mccartney + Lori Tully4259% games−1.6% vs expected
Irene Acosta + Terri Mrozinski4350% games−9.7% vs expected
Lori Tully + Terri Mrozinski4455% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jody Wilson
129W–39L career · 4 lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
4.15
4
Lori Tully
283W–135L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%65%35%
3.95
4
Alexandra Weeber
30W–21L career · type S · 3 lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Michele Mccartney
289W–130L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Bonnie Keating
243W–234L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Nancy Opilo
334W–191L career · 1 line in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Irene Acosta
100W–97L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Debora Covell
128W–74L career · no lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Caitlin Barcheski
59W–70L career · 3 lines in 2021
45%55%<1%
3.52
KIM FRUIN
78W–80L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
JoAnne Hangen
162W–281L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Terri Mrozinski
366W–431L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.