Teams

ABVanMeter (Southampton)

2025 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-05-05vs MJones/EPease (Life Time)Split 11
L#1 DoublesDenise Bost / Teri Iezzi vs Emily Pease / Tiffany Kopittke6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEsther Craig / Kim Rivera vs Holly Pasut / Jenny Wilken6-4, 6-4
2025-04-21vs AReynolds (CSRC)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesEsther Craig / Kim Rivera vs Heather Griffith / Renee Foster7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDenise Bost / Janice Daniel vs Pam Tan / Amy Ingalls3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesTeri Iezzi / Patrice Forbes vs Meghan Lay / Christine Strife1-6, 4-6
2025-04-14vs SBrown/KWagner (OPRC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesEsther Craig / Kim Rivera vs Nicole Woodley / Traci Semones6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanice Daniel / Denise Bost vs Deborah Toomey / Keiran Llaneza7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPaige Golding / Teri Iezzi vs Lynn Pronier / Meredith Tye1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-04-07vs MEccleston/JMcNally (Llifetime)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesTeri Iezzi / Michelle Davis vs Melissa Eccleston / Latha Baddigam3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesEsther Craig / Kim Rivera vs Olya Banchik / Madelaine LeBlanc6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJanice Daniel / Paige Golding vs Anna Gallup / Felicia Ahn6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-04-03vs RBrown (Park Crossing)Split 11
W#1 DoublesEsther Craig / Kim Rivera vs Cherie Bouchon / Susan McGinn6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTeri Iezzi / Cheri Johnson vs Jocelyn Zuehlke / Jenny Beacham6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-31vs MMetzl/SAsby (Sardis)Split 11
W#1 DoublesEsther Craig / Kim Rivera vs Tracy Graham / Martha Metzl6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesPaige Golding / Teri Iezzi vs Anne Whalan / Anne Wilson2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-03-17vs SAdditon/VPomfrey (Rolling Hills)Won 21
W#1 DoublesKim Rivera / Esther Craig vs Teri Snoke / Vanessa Pomfrey6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAnne-Bee van Meter / Paige Golding vs Teresa Richardson / Kate Merrill6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTeri Iezzi / Patrice Forbes vs Claudia Ridley / Erin Pacilli6-4, 7-6
2025-03-10vs SStorck (Rama)Won 20
W#1 DoublesEsther Craig / Kim Rivera vs Lori Andersen / Stephanie Gossert6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPaige Golding / Janice Daniel vs Lorie Lewis / Sharon Storck6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2025-03-03vs IRapaglia/MLynch (BCC)Won 21
W#1 DoublesKim Rivera / Esther Craig vs Carlene Delorenzo / Tiffani Wagner6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKaren Watford / Paige Golding vs Dori Cazorla / Terri Kletch2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAnne-Bee van Meter / Teri Iezzi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-02-24vs KPredmore (Queens)Won 21
W#1 DoublesEsther Craig / Kim Rivera vs Kimberly Fore / Lori Holcombe6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesPaige Golding vs Erin Overcash4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJanice Daniel / Denise Bost vs Sonia Hassani / Nicole Morgan6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Kim Rivera
published
3.50
Esther Craig
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.35
Karen Watford
published
3.33
Denise Bost
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Janice Daniel
published
3.30
Paige Golding
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Anne-Bee van Meter
published 3.5
3.23
Shelly Steffey
published
3.17
Cheri Johnson
published 3.5
3.10
Teri Iezzi
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.92
Patrice Forbes
published
2.89
Janet Layne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teri Iezzi + Denise Bost2548% gamesnot enough data
Paige Golding + Teri Iezzi1440% gamesnot enough data
Esther Craig + Paige Golding314 matchesnot enough data
Janice Daniel + Paige Golding314 matchesnot enough data
Esther Craig + Teri Iezzi033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Rivera
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Esther Craig
113W–61L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Karen Watford
12W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Denise Bost
205W–139L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Janice Daniel
17W–23L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Paige Golding
73W–45L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Anne-Bee van Meter
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shelly Steffey
44W–35L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Cheri Johnson
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Teri Iezzi
110W–84L career · 8 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Patrice Forbes
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.92
Janet Layne
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.