Teams

RP: G&G Tennis/Goldstein/Gorgievski

2022 RI Adult 40 & Over Men · 3.5 Men Flight 1

16 players · average NTRP 3.29 / RHODE ISLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesThomas Chaput / Steven Diehl vs Theodore Pietz / David Gwizdowski6-3, 2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAnthony Deluise vs Matthew Allder2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMohan Mahadevan / Arthur Silva vs Tim Simonson / Kenneth Wells1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesChris White vs Theodore Pietz1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDenis Fortier / Justin Wetherby vs David Gwizdowski / Tim Simonson2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesNicholas Gorgievski vs Matthew Allder0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesArthur Silva / James Allen vs Hector Derreza / Joe Caranci2-6, 0-6
2022-06-30vs CC: WilliamsWon 10
W#3 DoublesChris White / Arthur Silva vs Timothy Herbert / Adam Williams6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men Flight 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Justin Wetherby
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Arthur Silva
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Douglas Gray
published 3.5
3.23
Anthony Deluise
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
David OConnell
published 3.5
3.00
Steven Diehl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Nicholas Gorgievski
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.82
Denis Fortier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Erik Clark
published 3
James Allen
published 3
Chris White
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 0
Joseph Bixby
published
Mohan Mahadevan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Goldstein
published
Sean Cote
published
Thomas Chaput
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David OConnell + Sean Cote134 matchesnot enough data
Justin Wetherby + David OConnell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Justin Wetherby
35W–55L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Arthur Silva
1W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Douglas Gray
7W–21L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Anthony Deluise
19W–25L career · type M · 1 line in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
David OConnell
23W–30L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Steven Diehl
62W–48L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.00
Nicholas Gorgievski
31W–33L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Denis Fortier
41W–52L career · type A · 1 line in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Erik Clark
8W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
James Allen
32W–23L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
0
Chris White
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Joseph Bixby
17W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mohan Mahadevan
18W–25L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Robert Goldstein
40W–32L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sean Cote
9W–24L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Thomas Chaput
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.