Teams

Pinellas/Gelhaus

2026 Pinellas Adult 18 & Over Winter · 5.0 M Sunday

9 players · average NTRP 4.88 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-05vs McMullen LappanoWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlexandre BOURDIAUX / Max Francis vs Billy Humphries / Stephen Lappano6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesPaul Birdsong vs Matthew Schnell6-0, 6-3
2026-03-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesArtem Khaybullin / Jason Horwitz vs Chris Edwards / Peter Kim6-2, 6-1
2026-03-22vs McMullen LappanoWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlexandre BOURDIAUX / Connor Molina vs Stephen Lappano / Matthew Schnell6-0, 6-2
2026-03-15vs McMullen LappanoWon 30
W#1 DoublesRyan Gelhaus / Alexandre BOURDIAUX vs Chris Edwards / Peter Kim6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesConnor Molina vs Matthew Schnell6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTroy Brinker / Jason Horwitz vs Alejandro Sanchez / Alexander Sinu6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2026-03-08vs McMullen LappanoWon 21
W#1 DoublesTroy Brinker / Jose Camacho vs Billy Humphries / Alejandro Sanchez6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBen Nace vs Alexander Sinu6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAlexandre BOURDIAUX / Paul Birdsong vs Stephen Lappano / Matthew Schnell6-3, 6-1
2026-03-01vs McMullen LappanoWon 30
W#1 DoublesArtem Khaybullin / Nikolay Nikiforov vs Matthew Schnell / Alexander Sinu6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesPaul Birdsong vs Stephen Lappano6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMax Francis / Ryan Gelhaus vs Scott Rosen / Billy Humphries6-4, 6-4
2026-02-22vs McMullen LappanoWon 20
W#1 SinglesJose Camacho vs Stephen Lappano6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBen Nace / Jason Horwitz vs Chris Edwards / Peter Kim6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.0 M Sunday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pinellas/Gelhaus7017411139
2McMullen Lappano0741734210

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.45 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Connor Molina
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 5
4.72
Alexandre BOURDIAUX
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.66
Artem Khaybullin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.61
Troy Brinker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.41
Paul Birdsong
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.40
Jose Camacho
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.31
Ben Nace
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.25
Ryan Gelhaus
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.21
Jason Horwitz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Connor Molina
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
5
Alexandre BOURDIAUX
7W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.72
5
Artem Khaybullin
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.66
Troy Brinker
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.61
Paul Birdsong
8W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
4.41
Jose Camacho
16W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
4.40
4.5
Ben Nace
62W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
4.31
Ryan Gelhaus
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
4.25
Jason Horwitz
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.