Teams

Hillbrooke (Leanne Edison)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 4.0 Women (Lori Brown)

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (Lori Brown) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Leanne Edison
published
Emma Baginski
published 4
3.73
Lauren Brougher
published
3.66
JoAnn Houck
published
3.49
Andrea Thompson
published 4
3.37
Leslie Glass
published
3.24
Rachel Simes
published
3.20
Kala Cole
published
3.14
Amey Rishel
published 3.5
3.14
Jennifer Hayes
published
Logan Holt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Brougher + Leanne Edison5256% games+4.7% vs expected
JoAnn Houck + Leanne Edison4256% games+2.5% vs expected
Leanne Edison + Logan Holt224 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Brougher + JoAnn Houck213 matchesnot enough data
Amey Rishel + Leslie Glass033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leanne Edison
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Emma Baginski
11W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lauren Brougher
31W–7L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
JoAnn Houck
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.66
4
Andrea Thompson
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.49
Leslie Glass
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
Rachel Simes
33W–19L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
Kala Cole
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Amey Rishel
4W–16L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.14
Kimberly Rodriguez Garcia
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.14
Jennifer Hayes
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Logan Holt
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.