Teams

A7 ACAC Carter

2022 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 7.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-11-13vs A2 MRTC Battery Park HawleyWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Raihall / Christina Aeinan Kang vs Bernice White / Alexander Howlett3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-11-05vs A9 Woodlake O'DonnellLost 01
L#1 DoublesRyan Traylor / Christina Aeinan Kang vs John Kim / Julie Kratzer5-7, 3-6
2022-10-23vs A5 Burkwood ColginLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristina Aeinan Kang / Jeffrey Raihall vs Erin Decker / Mark Hudson4-6, 1-6
2022-10-16vs A1 ACAC SinghSplit 11
W#2 DoublesChristina Aeinan Kang / Steven Larue vs Nancy Jamer / Joseph Cipolla5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJane Riddle / Mark Carter vs Susan Lockhart / Darren Golden3-6, 0-6
2022-10-16vs A3 Dominion ShermanLost 01
L#2 DoublesMark Carter / Jane Riddle vs Ed Ohman / Johanna Farrell3-6, 0-6
2022-09-18vs A6 MAC Snow 7.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristina Aeinan Kang / Ryan Traylor vs John Bennett / Katie Hambrick0-6, 0-6
2022-09-10vs A4 Avalon GeorgeWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Raihall / Christina Aeinan Kang vs Lesley Terminella / Glenn Mizrach4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMark Carter / Jane Riddle vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Ryan Traylor
published
3.65
Christina Aeinan Kang
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.59
Lee Moore
published
3.43
Jeffrey Raihall
published
3.35
Jane Riddle
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Judy Napier
published
3.23
Elena Carter
published 3.5
3.23
Randolph Moore
published
3.21
Linda Larue
published
Mark Carter
published
Steven Larue
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryan Traylor
7W–12L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Christina Aeinan Kang
157W–167L career · 6 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Lee Moore
18W–16L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.59
Jeffrey Raihall
10W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
3.43
3.5
Jane Riddle
106W–67L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
Judy Napier
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Elena Carter
19W–15L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Randolph Moore
22W–26L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Linda Larue
18W–17L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Mark Carter
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Steven Larue
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.