Teams

BSmith/JNichols (Queens)

2023 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 8.5 Men - Tues PM

10 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-26Won 10
W#3 DoublesDaniel Nunn / Brandon Taylor vs Rex Varn / Andrew Varn3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-09-19vs NCook (Queens)Won 10
W#2 DoublesJosh Goldblatt / Chris Bauer vs DJ Karasik / Abraham Post5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2023-09-12vs JWolf/Eagan (WSRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJosh Goldblatt / Chris Bauer vs Jonathan Parks / BART AUSTIN4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-09-10vs SGallegos (Blakeney)Won 20
W#2 DoublesJosh Goldblatt / Richard Starling vs Scott Gallegos / Mark Utyesonich6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesEric Grand / Daniel Nunn vs Oliver Nield / Lawrence Jinks6-3, 6-2
2023-09-05vs CGardner/AZelepouga (Queens)Won 10
W#3 DoublesJosh Goldblatt / Chris Bauer vs Alex King / Ryan Poage6-1, 6-4
2023-08-22vs JClarke/Dukes (Queens)Won 10
W#3 DoublesJosh Goldblatt / Chris Bauer vs Jared Dukes / Kirk Harding6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2023-08-15vs DJones (Raintree)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJosh Goldblatt / Chris Bauer vs Scott Carlton / Brad VanHoy6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 8.5 Men - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Chris Bauer
published 4.5
4.29
Josh Goldblatt
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
4.12
Ravi Mujumdar
published
3.85
James Nichols
published 4
3.84
Daniel Nunn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Joe Rossi
published
3.46
Michael Dougherty
published
Michael Dellorfano
published
Richard Starling
published
Trip Caldwell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Josh Goldblatt + James Nichols14757% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chris Bauer
19W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
4.42
4.5
Josh Goldblatt
150W–75L career · 10 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
4.29
Ravi Mujumdar
19W–19L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
4.12
4
James Nichols
167W–76L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Daniel Nunn
102W–48L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.84
Joe Rossi
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82
Michael Dougherty
8W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.46
Michael Dellorfano
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Starling
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Trip Caldwell
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.