Teams

Fuller

2021 Tri Level Men · 4.5,4.0,3.5

1 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/EASTERN / WESTERN REGION

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Richard Gronostajski
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2020-11-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesJack Fuller / Richard Gronostajski vs Jingxin Qiu / Bo Xu1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2020-11-13Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRichard Gronostajski / Gustavo Lima vs Ryan Maher / Rob Batcho6-1, 6-4
2020-10-31Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJack Fuller / Richard Gronostajski vs Keith Koch / Jeffrey Murphy7-5, 6-3
2020-10-30Lost 01
L#3 DoublesGustavo Lima / Richard Gronostajski vs Rob Batcho / Ryan Maher7-5, 6-0
2020-10-23Won 10
W#3 DoublesJack Fuller / Richard Gronostajski vs Keith Koch / Jad Fares6-4, 6-4
2020-10-11Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJack Fuller / Richard Gronostajski vs Keith Koch / James Stancampiano6-4, 6-4
2020-09-25Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Feickert / Richard Gronostajski vs Ryan Carroll / Ryan Maher6-2, 6-2
2020-09-18Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRichard Gronostajski / Gustavo Lima vs Le Wang / Yang Xiao6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Richard Gronostajski
90W–91L career
6%94%0%
3.15

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.