Teams

Leo, Pam

2025 Mixed 40 & Over-JXN · 3.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-07-14vs Barnes, DarrylLost 12
W#1 DoublesMatthew Reece / Theresa Davis vs Alexandre Silva / Esther Young3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMike Leo / Jennifer Tripoli vs Larry Christian / Tamara Jackson3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPhillip King / Pam Leo vs Darryl Barnes / Temekia Jackson1-6, 1-6
2025-07-13vs Fulcher, JenniferLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Tripoli / Nathan Smith vs Mark Bradshaw / Jennifer Bradshaw2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Wilsford Hodges / Kurt Black vs Lee Anne Watson / Steven Patterson3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesPam Leo / Mike Leo vs Courtney Merideth / Philip Cothern6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-10vs Coins, JimmieLost 02
L#1 DoublesChase King / Matthew Reece vs Erica Craft / Yongfeng Zhao3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Tripoli / Matt Noland vs Kay Beasley / Stanley Rattler0-6, 2-6
2025-07-07vs Walters, EricLost 12
L#1 DoublesKurt Black / Mary Wilsford Hodges vs Marcello Gambino Meriles / Kate Feldman4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMike Leo / Pam Leo vs Randy Lominick / Wendy Ellis6-0, 7-5
L#3 DoublesChase King / Phillip King vs David Dunn / Nancy Miller3-6, 2-6
2025-06-30vs Harris, DarrellWon 21
W#1 DoublesTheresa Davis / Matthew Reece vs Carolyn Whyte / Jim Davis6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Tripoli / Nathan Smith vs Kelli Nicholson / Donald Baron6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChase King / Phillip King vs Suresh Alexander / Faye Santangelo0-6, 0-6
2025-06-23vs Fulcher, JenniferLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Wilsford Hodges / Matthew Reece vs Jennie Mullen / Philip Cothern3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNatalie Hutto / Jeremy Hutto vs Kevin Dotson / Courtney Merideth3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPam Leo / Mike Leo vs Jennifer Bradshaw / Mark Bradshaw3-6, 0-6
2025-06-09vs Barnes, DarrylLost 02
L#1 DoublesMatt Noland / Theresa Davis vs Darryl Barnes / Esther Young3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJeremy Hutto / Natalie Hutto vs Louis Saddler / Iona Remulta0-6, 1-6
2025-06-02vs Walters, EricWon 30
W#1 DoublesTheresa Davis / Matthew Reece vs Kate Feldman / Chad Feldman6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMary Wilsford Hodges / Nathan Smith vs Randy Lominick / Debbie Lominick6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNatalie Hutto / Jeremy Hutto vs Lydia Walters / Eric Walters6-2, 6-4
2025-05-19vs Harris, DarrellLost 03
L#1 DoublesMatt Noland / Theresa Davis vs Jim Davis / Carolyn Whyte6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNathan Smith / Jennifer Tripoli vs Suresh Alexander / Debbie Bryant4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPhillip King / Pam Leo vs Darrell Harris / Faye Santangelo4-6, 0-6
2025-05-05vs Coins, JimmieLost 03
L#1 DoublesNathan Smith / Chase King vs Erika Andrews / Stanley Rattler2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNatalie Hutto / Jeremy Hutto vs Denise McCray / Joseph McCray2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPam Leo / Mike Leo vs Erica Craft / Dwayne Robinson6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fulcher, Jennifer64171326226
2Leo, Pam28102044303
3Walters, Eric2872349335

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Matthew Reece
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Pam Leo
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.82
Jeremy Hutto
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Kurt Black
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.67
Mary Wilsford Hodges
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.63
Chase King
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.54
Shelly Gates
published
2.49
Jennifer Tripoli
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Matt Noland
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mike Leo
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Phillip King
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Theresa Davis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kurt Black + Mary Wilsford Hodges044 matchesnot enough data
Pam Leo + Mike Leo224 matchesnot enough data
Theresa Davis + Matthew Reece303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Reece
8W–1L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Pam Leo
30W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.88
Jeremy Hutto
5W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Kurt Black
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Mary Wilsford Hodges
22W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%11%89%
2.67
3
Chase King
29W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
2.63
Shelly Gates
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
Jennifer Tripoli
14W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%53%47%
2.49
Matt Noland
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mike Leo
2W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Phillip King
0W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Theresa Davis
12W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.