Teams

Hazel-Thomas

2022 Montgomery Adult 18 & Over Spring · Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.56 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-06-26vs Over&InWon 10
W#1 DoublesHeather Schreiber / Frances Brennan vs Khanita Suvarnasuddhi / Ruth Go Fernando Randle6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-14vs NKOTBLost 02
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Krudys / Sandy Horowitz vs Joy Wu / Shan Wang0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Cooper / Kim Hazel vs Ebla Aliibrahim / Miyuki Sato5-7, 1-6
2022-05-31vs Cosmic Strings 18Won 20
W#1 DoublesShannon Golub / Heather Schreiber vs Alison Serino / Micki Khademi6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLisa Thomas / Sorina Eftim vs Lindsay Ragheb / Michelle Lindstrom6-3, 6-2
2022-05-25vs All SetWon 20
W#2 DoublesRosalie Hooper / Andrea Motley vs Shobitha Nandi / Lynell James6-2, 5-4
W#3 DoublesLisa Thomas / Mary Beth Etherton vs Dora Macia / Alissa Neuhausen6-3, 6-4
2022-05-21vs NKOTBLost 02
L#1 DoublesHeather Schreiber / Shannon Golub vs Shan Wang / Joy Wu4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMaureen Cook / Rosalie Hooper vs Zoie Acadia / Brenda Kaechele6-7, 2-6
2022-05-12vs Over&InWon 20
W#2 DoublesSandy Horowitz / Suzanne Krudys vs Laura McNay / Ruth Go Fernando Randle5-7, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKim Hazel / Nancy Cooper vs Monica Duckles / Karina Guisande6-2, 6-4
2022-05-06vs Cosmic Strings 18Won 20
W#2 DoublesKim Hazel / Nancy Cooper vs Carey Greenauer / Mayumi Ishihara7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSarah Speirs / Mary Beth Etherton vs Nicole Brizan / Tamar Henkin6-1, 6-4
2022-04-25vs NKOTBLost 02
L#2 SinglesSorina Eftim vs Patcharavalai Lawhcharoen6-3, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMaureen Cook / Rosalie Hooper vs Zoie Acadia / Natasha Rones3-6, 6-7
2022-04-09vs Cosmic Strings 18Won 20
W#1 DoublesHeather Schreiber / Shannon Golub vs Melissa Hayes-Gehrke / Meglyn Lansing6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMary Beth Etherton / Sarah Speirs vs Bhanu Rajput / Karlene Brathwaite6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Heather Schreiber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Kirah Yen
published
3.40
Shannon Golub
published
3.37
Penelope Bell
published
3.35
Maureen Cook
published
3.33
Nancy Cooper
published
3.33
Suzanne Krudys
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Sarah Speirs
published
3.27
Nicola Goren
published
Andrea Motley
published 3.5
Frances Brennan
published 3.5
3.20
Mary Barton-Dock
published
3.18
Rosalie Hooper
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Sandy Horowitz
published
3.12
Sorina Eftim
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Mary Beth Etherton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Kim Hazel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Millette Miller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Beth Etherton + Kim Hazel213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Heather Schreiber
110W–72L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
Kirah Yen
42W–29L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
Shannon Golub
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
3.40
Penelope Bell
18W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Maureen Cook
21W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
Nancy Cooper
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Suzanne Krudys
152W–110L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Sarah Speirs
33W–12L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
Nicola Goren
14W–11L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Andrea Motley
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Frances Brennan
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Barton-Dock
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Rosalie Hooper
188W–181L career · 3 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Sandy Horowitz
13W–20L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Sorina Eftim
127W–132L career · 2 lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Mary Beth Etherton
141W–140L career · 3 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Kim Hazel
98W–117L career · 3 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.98
Millette Miller
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.