Teams

Crooke - RS Clay

2022 Escambia Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Combo 18 & Over - Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.17 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-11-30vs Escambia/Gonzalez/8.5/WomenLost 03
L#1 DoublesShaner Garner Crooke / Jena Wise vs Claudia Simmons / Arlene Doyle1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Covell / Carly Russell vs Lauren Haack / Whitney Sumrall3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Nitterauer / Angela Stewart vs Lori Gonzalez / Shellie McCall2-6, 1-6
2022-11-27vs Greene - RS ClayLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Nitterauer / Carly Russell vs Shelby Greene / Amber Fletcher6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesShaner Garner Crooke / Jena Wise vs Charlotte Stark / Gina Bevino4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-11-09vs Escambia/Gonzalez/8.5/WomenLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichelle Covell / Carly Russell vs Lori Gonzalez / Shellie McCall3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Nitterauer / Angela Stewart vs Carel Demanss / Whitney Sumrall0-6, 2-6
2022-11-02Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSusan Nitterauer / Jena Wise vs Mary Jane Evertz / Melissa Paravalos2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Combo 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Jami Steinmetz
published 4.5
4.24
Michelle Covell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.98
3.97
Susan Nitterauer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Carly Russell
published 4
3.61
Angela Stewart
published 4
3.44
Jena Wise
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Nitterauer + Michelle Covell14757% games−12.5% vs expected
Jena Wise + Susan Nitterauer033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jami Steinmetz
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
Michelle Covell
92W–70L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
4.24
Shaner Garner Crooke
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.98
Susan Nitterauer
149W–130L career · 4 lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.97
4
Carly Russell
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Angela Stewart
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
Jena Wise
38W–96L career · 3 lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
3.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.