Teams

PBT

Adult Team Tennis · HHI Team Tennis

22 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings10 teams · HHI Team Tennis
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CPAcers000000
2SC Yacht Club000000
3Wexford000000
4South Beach Mixed Nuts000000
5HHTT/Tyson/Spring Lake000000
6Port Royal Players000000
7LC Kiss My Ace000000
8Shipyard SuperShots000000
9SPCC No Faults000000
10PBT000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Brent Borchert
published 4.5
3.83
Jake Gartner
published
3.70
William Gardner
published
3.64
Gretchen Moore
published
3.32
Zach Patterson
published
3.30
Amanda Cifaldi
published 3.5
3.19
Ivy Burdick
published
3.18
Joe Rapp
published
3.17
Daniel Studenc
published 3.5
3.12
Joe Short
published
3.08
John Faucher
published
3.08
Heather Lossada
published
2.95
Todd Crutchley
published
2.95
Laura Horton
published
2.93
Virginia Crutchley
published
2.90
Jenifer Fielding
published
2.84
Lynne Faucher
published
2.82
Diane Gardner
published 3
2.75
Sue Rapp
published
2.55
Shelby Dillon
published
2.54
Samantha Borchert
published
Jessica Gardner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zach Patterson + John Faucher134 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Studenc + Joe Short213 matchesnot enough data
Todd Crutchley + John Faucher213 matchesnot enough data
Heather Lossada + Diane Gardner213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brent Borchert
18W–14L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.19
Jake Gartner
14W–10L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.83
William Gardner
36W–21L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
Gretchen Moore
24W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.64
Zach Patterson
9W–17L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Amanda Cifaldi
42W–22L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
Ivy Burdick
14W–15L career · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Joe Rapp
10W–10L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Daniel Studenc
12W–20L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Joe Short
20W–34L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
John Faucher
7W–17L career · no lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08
Heather Lossada
8W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.08
Todd Crutchley
15W–17L career · no lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.95
Laura Horton
10W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
Virginia Crutchley
22W–38L career · no lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.93
Jenifer Fielding
12W–13L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
2.90
Lynne Faucher
19W–47L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Diane Gardner
24W–21L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Sue Rapp
13W–28L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75
Shelby Dillon
20W–7L career · no lines in 2026
0%36%64%
2.55
Samantha Borchert
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
2.54
Jessica Gardner
26W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.