Teams

GT Bray Ms Hits

2026 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Winter Weekend · 3.5 W Saturday

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-03-14vs LWN Arrington 40Won 10
W#3 DoublesJoan Hutchings / Christin Costas vs Teresa Knight / Denise McKenna7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2026-03-08vs Lake Club Armiak 40Lost 02
L#1 DoublesBeth Arndt / Jacqueline Dezelski vs Jeanne OConnor / Marlene Searle7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTerry Olsen / Catherine Bartlett vs Linda Heitzner / Cecile Wooster1-6, 3-6
2026-03-07vs TPC - 3.5 40+ Saturday ROSSWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Simotes / Rhonda Sutton vs Sandra Poston / Karen Kondrad6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMargaret Kirkland vs Trisha Moslin6-0, 2-0
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Dezelski / Terry Olsen vs Stephanie Miles / Marcia Frost6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-02-21vs River Strand Weston 40Lost 02
L#2 DoublesAlison Oakley / Christin Costas vs Heather Boccia / Cori Knupp2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTerry Olsen / Cynthia Petrik vs Susan Nicoletti / Holly Anderson6-7, 3-6
2026-02-14vs LWR Slice Slice BabyLost 13
L#1 DoublesBeth Arndt / Victoria Campbell vs Susan Kwon / Casey Baynes2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLisa Simotes vs Regina Beatty3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCynthia Petrik / Christin Costas vs Martha Roberts / Noelle Hage3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Pauley / Terry Olsen vs Claudia Kelly / Nancy Bartlett4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-02-07vs Payne Park NarwhalsLost 13
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Dezelski / Beth Arndt vs Bev Murray / Christine Shields7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMargaret Kirkland vs Amber Mockovciak6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJoan Hutchings / Rhonda Sutton vs Barbara Prince / Rebecca Zion2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCatherine Bartlett / Lisa Pauley vs Faye Long / Patty Avery6-3, 6-4
2026-01-31vs TPC - 3.5 40+ Saturday ROSSWon 31
L#1 DoublesLisa Simotes / Rhonda Sutton vs Rebecca Gibson / Lisa Pyser4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMargaret Kirkland vs Sandra Poston6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesVictoria Campbell / Jacqueline Dezelski vs Karen Kondrad / Kim Bennaji6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChristin Costas / Joan Hutchings vs Mauri Blefeld / Stephanie Miles7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2026-01-24vs TPC WindsorSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBeth Arndt / Lisa Simotes vs Brittany Blackman / Polina Windsor3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMargaret Kirkland vs Lisa Ahlman6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Dezelski / Victoria Campbell vs Mercy Ford / Melissa Grossenkemper7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCynthia Petrik / Lisa Pauley vs Becky Atluru / Alina Fotache6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-01-10vs Lake Club Armiak 40Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTerry Olsen / Rhonda Sutton vs Linda Armiak / Marlene Searle3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Jacqueline Dezelski
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.46
Rhonda Sutton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Margaret Kirkland
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.40
Lisa Simotes
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.30
Cynthia Petrik
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Alison Oakley
published 3.5
3.24
Victoria Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Beth Arndt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Catherine Bartlett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Christin Costas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Joan Hutchings
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.11
Holly Trueba
published
3.10
Lisa Pauley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Terry Olsen
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joan Hutchings + Rhonda Sutton4257% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Simotes + Rhonda Sutton224 matchesnot enough data
Victoria Campbell + Beth Arndt224 matchesnot enough data
Margaret Kirkland + Beth Arndt213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jacqueline Dezelski
43W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
Rhonda Sutton
10W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
Margaret Kirkland
5W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.40
Lisa Simotes
41W–51L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Cynthia Petrik
71W–48L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Alison Oakley
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Victoria Campbell
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Beth Arndt
6W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Catherine Bartlett
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Christin Costas
11W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
Joan Hutchings
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
Holly Trueba
2W–5L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
Lisa Pauley
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
3.10
Terry Olsen
80W–129L career · 5 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.