Teams

Team Forman2 (Kendalltown)

2021 Miami-Dade Adult 40 & Over - Spring Day · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-03-24vs Porter (Deering Bay)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAna Veloso vs Heather Hewitson6-7, 1-6
2021-03-17vs Pino (Salvadore Park)Won 10
W#1 SinglesAna Veloso vs Maria Basterra6-0, 6-4
2021-03-10vs Longa (Salvadore Park)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAna Veloso vs Angelica Gallagher6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2021-02-26vs Moore (Coral Oaks)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAna Veloso vs Estefania Mai5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2021-02-24vs Miami-Dade - Shula's/MagoulasLost 01
L#1 SinglesAna Veloso vs NOOR BLAZEKOVIC MENDOZA2-6, 1-6
2021-02-03vs Rigl (Royal Palm)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAna Veloso vs Ana Thompson2-6, 3-6
2021-01-27vs Reyes (Ron Ehmann)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAna Veloso vs Claudia Viso5-7, 4-6
2021-01-20vs Team Forman1 (Kendalltown)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAna Veloso vs Maricarmen Diazmiron2-6, 3-6
2021-01-13vs Odon (Doral Park)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAna Veloso vs Paula Jaramillo5-7, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Mellissa Cili
published 3.5
3.41
Leticia Diaz
published
3.38
Kelly James
published
3.36
Luisa Angel
published
3.20
Silvana Caamano
published 3.5
3.17
3.16
Ana Veloso
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Ana Gutierrez
published 3.5
3.15
3.04
ANGELA MUSSO
published 3.5
2.96
Jane Levitz
published
2.92
Jane Forman
published
Mirta Alvarez
published
SERAP CARDAK
published
Tere Aloma
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

ANGELA MUSSO + Maria Fernandez de Castro4253% games+10.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mellissa Cili
229W–184L career · no lines in 2021
<1%30%70%
3.57
Leticia Diaz
78W–30L career · no lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.41
Kelly James
19W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%82%17%
3.38
Luisa Angel
3W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Silvana Caamano
80W–136L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
Maria Fernandez de Castro
12W–15L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Ana Veloso
54W–94L career · 9 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Ana Gutierrez
0W–9L career · type A · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
Maria Teresa Azucena
9W–21L career · no lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
ANGELA MUSSO
8W–19L career · type A · no lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
3.04
Jane Levitz
1W–7L career · no lines in 2021
62%38%<1%
2.96
Mariagrazia Salvador
5W–8L career · no lines in 2021
73%27%<1%
2.92
Jane Forman
13W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mirta Alvarez
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
SERAP CARDAK
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tere Aloma
0W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.