Teams

Egeli

2022 St. Marys Mixed 18 & Over · St. Marys Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-05-22vs GladwellLost 01
L#1 DoublesJames Borell / Nhi Phung vs Jacqueline Kelly-Bankins / Kevin Findley2-6, 2-6
2022-05-15vs GladwellLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoseph Taylor / Nhi Phung vs Megan Gladwell / Rick Gladwell4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-04-24vs GladwellWon 10
W#1 DoublesJames Borell / Nhi Phung vs Rick Gladwell / Jacqueline Kelly-Bankins6-4, 6-4
2022-04-03vs GladwellLost 01
L#2 DoublesAdrian Stanton / Nhi Phung vs Megan Gladwell / John Neville0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for St. Marys Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Joseph Taylor
published
3.40
Nhi Phung
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Adrian Stanton
published 3.5
3.26
James Borell
published 3.5
Amy Egeli
published 3.5
3.22
Casey MCFANN
published 3.5
2.73
Karen Adriani
published
Don Behrens
published
John Zittere
published
Rachel Lytle
published
Sonia Roy
published
Trey Bergen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joseph Taylor + Rachel Lytle033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joseph Taylor
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Nhi Phung
88W–65L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Adrian Stanton
3W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
James Borell
2W–2L career · type M · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Amy Egeli
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Casey MCFANN
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
Karen Adriani
0W–11L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%0%
2.73
Don Behrens
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
John Zittere
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rachel Lytle
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sonia Roy
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Trey Bergen
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.