Teams

STC-LaPole

2022 OH OV FALL A18&O · Fall 3.5 Women Weekend Dayton

14 players · average NTRP 3.38 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Fall 3.5 Women Weekend Dayton have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Lori West
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.65
Tabatha Ashley
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.56
Deborah Benton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.55
Sara Robbins
published
3.55
Cindy Wehrkamp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Amanda Dillon
published 3.5
2.99
Kim LaPole
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.82
Jennifer Arnett
published
2.71
Janice Bensman
published
2.65
Jacki Francis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Cindy Weikert
published
Julia Stefanko
published
Margaret Chopra
published
Michelle Conrad
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori West + Cindy Wehrkamp22565% games+9.9% vs expected
Cindy Weikert + Michelle Conrad5450% games+2.2% vs expected
Cindy Weikert + Janice Bensman3250% games+1.8% vs expected
Kim LaPole + Sara Robbins351657% games+0.4% vs expected
Jacki Francis + Margaret Chopra2640% games−0.7% vs expected
Janice Bensman + Michelle Conrad4645% games−1.6% vs expected
Janice Bensman + Jacki Francis51839% games−3.6% vs expected
Janice Bensman + Jennifer Arnett2442% games−6.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori West
183W–83L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
Tabatha Ashley
43W–69L career · 3 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Deborah Benton
8W–7L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
3.56
Sara Robbins
156W–74L career · no lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
3.55
3.5
Cindy Wehrkamp
123W–55L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%36%64%
3.55
3.5
Amanda Dillon
43W–62L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Kim LaPole
90W–168L career · 5 lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
2.99
Jennifer Arnett
61W–85L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
Janice Bensman
101W–227L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Jacki Francis
41W–159L career · 2 lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
2.65
Cindy Weikert
21W–29L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Julia Stefanko
12W–40L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Margaret Chopra
14W–41L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Conrad
42W–48L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.