Teams

GEPTA/55&over/6.0M/Zanolli/TW

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE

10 players · average NTRP 2.88 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-03Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJames Zanolli / Roberto Molina vs Jorge Kareh / Christopher Ninkovich2-6, 6-7
2025-07-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHugh Larratt-smith / Roberto Molina vs Ken O'Neal / Jose Gonzalez0-6, 2-6
2025-07-13Lost 01
L#3 DoublesHugh Larratt-smith / Roberto Molina vs Bill Ruddock / Ralph Rasura0-6, 0-6
2025-07-08Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJames Zanolli / Roberto Molina vs Ralph Rasura / Edgar Borrego2-6, 5-7
2025-06-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesAndrew Michnovicz / Roberto Molina vs Donald Rhodes / Kevin Woodson7-6, 0-6, 1-0
2025-06-27Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDaniel Gallatin / Roberto Molina vs Edward Sosa / Craig Fortune7-5, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Andrew Michnovicz
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published 3
2.82
Daniel Gallatin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 3
2.57
James Zanolli
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published 3
Hugh Larratt-smith
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Jay David
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
Manny Casillas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Oren Belkin
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published
Roberto Molina
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Syed Yusoof
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
William Tepsick
usually #3 Doubles 62%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Gallatin + Oren Belkin5648% gamesnot enough data
William Tepsick + James Zanolli0520% gamesnot enough data
Andrew Michnovicz + Daniel Gallatin3252% gamesnot enough data
Daniel Gallatin + Jay David2349% gamesnot enough data
William Tepsick + Daniel Gallatin134 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Michnovicz + Oren Belkin314 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Gallatin + James Zanolli044 matchesnot enough data
William Tepsick + Andrew Michnovicz123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Andrew Michnovicz
109W–72L career · 34 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Daniel Gallatin
53W–88L career · 28 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
3
James Zanolli
6W–38L career · 18 lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
2.57
2.5
Hugh Larratt-smith
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jay David
5W–11L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Manny Casillas
13W–24L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Oren Belkin
47W–45L career · 26 lines in 2025
not enough data
Roberto Molina
6W–21L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Syed Yusoof
9W–45L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data
William Tepsick
21W–83L career · 21 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.