Teams

Refunds

2025 Adult 40 & Over League · Refunds

16 players · average NTRP 3.69 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Refunds have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Rosie Rogers
published
3.84
Emily van Dixhoorn
published
3.71
Arlene Conger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.52
Janet Locke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Lynne Schachte
published 4
3.46
Maria McKinstry
published
3.40
Daphne Katz
published 3.5
3.39
Theresa Nobles
published 3.5
3.38
Janis Behymer
published 3.5
3.18
Aaron Backus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Elizabeth Miars
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Karin Britt
published 3.5
Kyra Severson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Nikhil Kumsi
published
Pat Greathouse
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Rachel Hallsten
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Theresa Nobles + Janet Locke8356% games−0.4% vs expected
Theresa Nobles + Daphne Katz5846% gamesnot enough data
Theresa Nobles + Janis Behymer3449% gamesnot enough data
Janis Behymer + Janet Locke2541% gamesnot enough data
Daphne Katz + Janet Locke4256% gamesnot enough data
Maria McKinstry + Janet Locke044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rosie Rogers
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.95
Emily van Dixhoorn
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Arlene Conger
71W–48L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Janet Locke
46W–68L career · 1 line in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
4
Lynne Schachte
20W–37L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
Maria McKinstry
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Daphne Katz
24W–30L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Theresa Nobles
31W–36L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Janis Behymer
36W–40L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Aaron Backus
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Elizabeth Miars
16W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.13
3.5
Karin Britt
100W–82L career · no lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
2.85
Kyra Severson
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nikhil Kumsi
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pat Greathouse
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Hallsten
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.