Teams

3-RLong--CCC-40 6.5

2022 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · Eno River 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-09-20vs 5-COMBO-Bland-CHTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesJAMES MONTAGUE / Arash Chehrazi vs Mark Thomsen / Mitch Kleiman7-5, 6-3
2022-09-13vs 1-CLee-HSLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrent Fox / Rick Edmunds vs David Stefan / Hayes Hofler1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-09-06vs 2-DNaden-HSWon 10
W#2 DoublesArash Chehrazi / JAMES MONTAGUE vs Jeff Denhard / Dave Thomas6-4, 6-3
2022-08-23vs 4-AYoung-EV-6.5-Combo-40+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBrent Fox / Arash Chehrazi vs Aaron Young / Christopher DeFusco6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2022-08-16vs 5-COMBO-Bland-CHTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesJAMES MONTAGUE / Arash Chehrazi vs Gary Glish / David Gilliam1-6, 2-6
2022-08-09vs 2-DNaden-HSSplit 11
L#1 DoublesArash Chehrazi / Brent Fox vs Scott Hartman / Chris Konvalinka7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRick Edmunds / David Schumann vs Steve Berntsen / David Naden6-1, 6-0
2022-08-02vs 1-CLee-HSWon 20
W#1 DoublesArash Chehrazi / JAMES MONTAGUE vs Dirk Kumashiro / Will Johnson7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Schumann / Rick Edmunds vs David Stefan / Kyle Jackson3-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Schumann
published 4
3.34
JAMES MONTAGUE
published 3.5
3.32
Arash Chehrazi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Rick Edmunds
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Robert Long
published
2.83
2.82
Mary T Long
published
2.75
Travis Angle
published
Brent Fox
published 3
Omid Uskowi
published
Stephen Arrowood
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Long + Rick Edmunds3642% games−3.2% vs expected
Rick Edmunds + Arash Chehrazi224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Schumann
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
JAMES MONTAGUE
29W–43L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Arash Chehrazi
87W–57L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3
Rick Edmunds
77W–93L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
2.96
Robert Long
21W–47L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Christopher LeGrand
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
Mary T Long
48W–104L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
Travis Angle
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Brent Fox
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Omid Uskowi
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephen Arrowood
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.