Teams

DB - Crawford

2023 Alachua Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.30 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-28vs JTC - WoodyWon 20
W#1 DoublesJamie Primosch / Kelly Banes vs Tracey Bryant / Mary Cribb6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnne Billion / Lan Hoang-Minh vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-25vs JTC - WoodyWon 30
W#1 SinglesAnne Billion vs Alison Andrus4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWheeler Crawford / Kelly Banes vs Mary Cribb / Jennine Brandt6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHeather Gibson / Tara Edelstein vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-11vs JTC - WoodyWon 10
W#2 DoublesKelly Banes / Rachel Rodriguez vs Mary Cribb / Alison Andrus7-5, 6-2
2023-06-03vs JTC - WoodyWon 21
L#1 DoublesKelly Banes / Jamie Primosch vs Courtney Woody / Taiana Mendez6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAnne Billion vs Valerie de Crecy6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTara Edelstein / Heather Gibson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-26vs JTC - WoodyWon 10
W#1 SinglesAnne Billion vs Kim Magee6-0, 6-2
2023-05-07vs JTC - WoodyLost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Banes / Wheeler Crawford vs Mary Cribb / Courtney Woody3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Kelly Banes
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.35
Emily Dace
published 4.5
4.24
Anne Billion
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.96
Wheeler Crawford
published
3.82
Jordan Davis
published
3.78
Caroline Hord
published 4
3.77
Tammy Miller
published
3.68
Tara Edelstein
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.64
Lynn Godwin
published
3.41
Heather Gibson
published 4
Maria Curatolo
published
Susan Benton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Banes + Emily Dace314 matchesnot enough data
Tammy Miller + Heather Gibson314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kelly Banes
136W–60L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
4.37
4.5
Emily Dace
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
4.35
4.5
Anne Billion
110W–84L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
4.24
Wheeler Crawford
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.96
Jordan Davis
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Caroline Hord
14W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.78
Tammy Miller
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Tara Edelstein
88W–67L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
Lynn Godwin
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.64
4
Heather Gibson
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
3.41
Maria Curatolo
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Benton
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.