Teams

PINEY RUN

2024 Washington D.C. Adult 40 & Over · Washington D.C. Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-16vs Chip N ChargeLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristopher Banks / Steven Gibau vs Larry McCollum / Parmvir Singh3-6, 5-5
2024-03-09vs Chip N ChargeLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristopher Banks / Steven Gibau vs Matthew Ganney / James Rowe0-6, 2-6
2024-02-25vs Chip N ChargeWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristopher Banks / Steven Gibau vs Larry McCollum / Hector Vargas4-6, 6-3
2024-02-04vs Chip N ChargeLost 01
L#1 DoublesSteven Gibau / Peyton Ware vs Andy Bressler / Parmvir Singh6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2024-01-21vs Chip N ChargeLost 01
L#2 DoublesSteven Gibau / Peyton Ware vs Christopher Graves / Marc Schoeni0-6, 3-6
2024-01-07vs Chip N ChargeLost 01
L#1 DoublesMervin Dennis / Steven Gibau vs Matthew Ganney / Hector Vargas0-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Washington D.C. Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Christopher Banks
published 3.5
3.31
Steven Park
published
3.19
Gerald Anekwe
published
3.12
Mervin Dennis
published
3.03
Steven Gibau
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.49
Penelope Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Peyton Ware
published
Segun Eubanks
published
Thomas Calhoun
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Banks + Steven Park6079% games+23.0% vs expected
Christopher Banks + Gerald Anekwe6261% games−0.6% vs expected
Steven Park + Gerald Anekwe213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christopher Banks
55W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.43
Steven Park
57W–40L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Gerald Anekwe
27W–19L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
Mervin Dennis
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Steven Gibau
167W–242L career · 6 lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.03
Penelope Wilson
34W–63L career · 3 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
2.49
Peyton Ware
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Segun Eubanks
6W–22L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Thomas Calhoun
12W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.