Teams

Vachon/Chattanooga

2026 Adult 18 & Over-Chattanooga · 3.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-17vs Bell/ChattanoogaWon 20
W#2 SinglesJustin Shoemaker vs D Scott Clark7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarter Black / David Gardner vs Kirk Watkins / William Matlock6-1, 6-1
2026-05-14vs Bell/ChattanoogaWon 21
W#1 SinglesCarter Black vs Robert Miller3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMy Le / John Thomas vs Shane Bo Searcey / Kirk Watkins0-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesBlake Ramsey vs Zed Mansfield6-2, 6-3
2026-05-02vs Bell/ChattanoogaWon 31
L#1 DoublesCarter Black / John Thomas vs Matthew Blentlinger / D Scott Clark3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJustin Shoemaker vs Shane Bo Searcey6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDavid Martin / Blake Ramsey vs Jonathan Walker Harville / Aadi Patel6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMy Le / David Gardner vs Mustafa Faleh / Kirk Watkins7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2026-04-12vs Bell/ChattanoogaWon 21
W#1 DoublesMatt Muhlada / David Martin vs Amante Agbannaoag / Jonathan Walker Harville6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCarter Black / My Le vs Matthew Blentlinger / D Scott Clark3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Gardner / Justin Shoemaker vs Shane Bo Searcey / Kirk Watkins4-6, 4-6
2026-04-04vs Bell/ChattanoogaWon 21
W#1 DoublesMatt Muhlada / Mitchell Muhlada vs Shane Bo Searcey / Hector I Olivencia6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJustin Shoemaker vs Matthew Blentlinger1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMy Le / Carter Black vs Robert Miller / Jay Bell6-0, 6-0
2026-03-28vs Bell/ChattanoogaWon 30
W#1 DoublesMatt Muhlada / Mitchell Muhlada vs Robert Miller / Kirk Watkins6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCarter Black vs Matthew Blentlinger3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Gardner / My Le vs Mustafa Faleh / William Matlock5-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Matt Muhlada
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Reggie Vachon
published
2.99
Carter Black
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Blake Ramsey
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Justin Shoemaker
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.65
My Le
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matt Muhlada
17W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.11
Reggie Vachon
13W–30L career · no lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Carter Black
7W–2L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Blake Ramsey
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Justin Shoemaker
4W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
My Le
9W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.