Teams

Martin L&T 3.0-4.0

2024 Sandhills Tri Level 18 & over · 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.69 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Christina McKenzie
published 4.5
3.89
Robin McClymont
published
3.71
Katrina Bullard
published
3.66
Susan Omell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Joy Martin
published
3.56
Ann Tucker
published 3.5
3.54
Ashley Hennings
published 4
3.35
Amity Aldridge
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.32
Sajata Strong
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.20
Lisa Nixon
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.82
Tammy Keller
published
2.70
Denise Bauer Frazier
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3
Megan Hunt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Tucker + Amity Aldridge6656% games+6.7% vs expected
Amity Aldridge + Sajata Strong8553% games−1.1% vs expected
Joy Martin + Susan Omell4646% games−4.2% vs expected
Katrina Bullard + Susan Omell7252% games−13.6% vs expected
Susan Omell + Sajata Strong8847% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Nixon + Amity Aldridge5745% gamesnot enough data
Christina McKenzie + Ann Tucker9165% gamesnot enough data
Tammy Keller + Denise Bauer Frazier3643% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christina McKenzie
50W–28L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.22
Robin McClymont
53W–34L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.89
Katrina Bullard
23W–16L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Susan Omell
189W–247L career · 4 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.66
Joy Martin
57W–78L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.65
3.5
Ann Tucker
63W–36L career · no lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
3.56
4
Ashley Hennings
21W–28L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Amity Aldridge
113W–101L career · 9 lines in 2024
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Sajata Strong
108W–87L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Lisa Nixon
99W–156L career · 7 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Tammy Keller
24W–30L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Denise Bauer Frazier
64W–77L career · 11 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
Megan Hunt
8W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.