Teams

1-MLong-ENO-18+ 6.5

2022 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · Eno River 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Evening

11 players · average NTRP 3.19 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-09-29vs 4-MMiller-CHTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesSarah Mills / Kimberly Lamm vs Karen Wood / Sarah DeVore0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKari Lovetinsky / Megan Chiles vs Mindy Miller / Sarah Towles6-7, 2-6
2022-09-20vs 5-MSanchez-Eno-18 6.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Montague / Megan Chiles vs Elizabeth Chan / Kristi Laan5-7, 1-1
2022-09-15vs 2-ECurry-SVCLost 12
W#1 DoublesMegan Chiles / Kari Lovetinsky vs Melissa Coward / Rachel Sendor7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMary T Long / Tammy Chin vs Erin McElligott / Carli Opland2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKimberly Lamm / Allison Taylor vs Laura Caldwell / Kay Jordan2-6, 2-6
2022-09-06vs 3-KDonica-ENOLost 01
L#1 DoublesTammy Chin / Terry Friddle vs Abby Olmsted / Laura Williams4-6, 3-6
2022-08-31vs 9-JYurkovich-HVFLost 12
L#1 DoublesHalle Amick / Megan Chiles vs Eleanor Neilson / Bethany Garrison4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesTerry Friddle / Tammy Chin vs Emma Gould / MacKenzie Gokey6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKari Lovetinsky / Michelle Hooper vs Kristie Elliott / Khatija Long6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-08-30vs 6-SBrogden-Eno- 18+ 6.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesHalle Amick / Megan Chiles vs Sheza Healey / Berna Tareen6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKimberly Lamm / Sara Lawrence vs Bracha Blanc / Tanya Barcinas1-6, 5-7
2022-08-09vs 7-AYoung-EVWon 20
W#1 DoublesTammy Chin / Megan Chiles vs Amanda Pierce / Kristin Isaacs6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTerry Friddle / Halle Amick vs Laura Cannon / Tarry Payton6-0, 6-0
2022-08-04vs 8-CIrish - ENOLost 02
L#1 DoublesHalle Amick / Sara Lawrence vs Janice Clayton / DJ Maniace7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTerry Friddle / Michelle Hooper vs Sabrina Kane / Anne Hungate0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Megan Chiles
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.67
Lisa Montague
published
3.13
Tammy Chin
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.04
Sara Lawrence
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.97
Halle Amick
published 3
2.82
Mary T Long
published
2.81
Kari Lovetinsky
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
MaryJo McNeill
published
2.71
Terry Friddle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.69
Blake Ellis
published 3
2.54
Kimberly Lamm
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kari Lovetinsky + Sara Lawrence044 matchesnot enough data
Kari Lovetinsky + Megan Chiles314 matchesnot enough data
Sara Lawrence + Mary T Long303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Megan Chiles
155W–47L career · 9 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Lisa Montague
39W–48L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%1%
3.67
3.5
Tammy Chin
85W–80L career · 9 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
3
Sara Lawrence
160W–120L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Halle Amick
14W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
2.97
Mary T Long
48W–104L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Kari Lovetinsky
116W–121L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
MaryJo McNeill
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Terry Friddle
164W–164L career · 4 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Blake Ellis
12W–27L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Kimberly Lamm
86W–102L career · 3 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.