Teams

CCWH - J. Burns

Polk Casual League · Polk Ladies Casual Play Fall

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_4

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Polk Ladies Casual Play Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Leilani Guinn
published
3.33
Meghan Savant
published 3.5
Brittany Ward
published 3.5
3.18
Elizabeth Merritt
published 3.5
3.13
Catie Kincaid
published 3.5
3.10
Leah Carrerou
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Jennifer Burns
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.00
Deanna Murchison
published 3
2.99
Andrea Jahna
published 3
2.96
Hannah Taylor
published 3
2.93
2.73
Holly Worrell
published 3
2.62
Jan Hyman
usually #4 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Melissa Burns
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Burns + Meghan Savant14858% games+6.2% vs expected
Leah Carrerou + Elizabeth Merritt033 matchesnot enough data
Hannah Taylor + Courtney McCrystal213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leilani Guinn
13W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%23%
3.41
3.5
Meghan Savant
82W–39L career · no lines in 2022
1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Brittany Ward
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Merritt
2W–13L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Catie Kincaid
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
Leah Carrerou
87W–95L career · 24 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Jennifer Burns
89W–64L career · 20 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Deanna Murchison
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Andrea Jahna
4W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Hannah Taylor
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Courtney McCrystal
11W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Holly Worrell
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Jan Hyman
66W–86L career · 9 lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
2.62
Melissa Burns
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.