Teams

Ko Olina Krew

2024 Mixed 55 and Over League · 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-11-23vs Racquet MastersLost 03
L#1 DoublesGarren Thomas / Janet Fujiyama vs Jenny Wendel / Kenneth Eguchi3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStewart Turner / Jody Thomas vs Leighton Lum / Peggy Watanabe7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRyan Schreiber / Jane Turner vs Anna Hinkley / Ryan Yamasaki1-6, 3-6
2024-11-16vs Double TroubleLost 03
L#1 DoublesKenneth Delano / Jody Thomas vs Kevin Ching / Tamami Tomida2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGarren Thomas / Lori Fujimori vs Derrick Kau / Andrea Weathers2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRichard Mahoney / Janet Fujiyama vs Ritch Dinh / Donna Chang-Dinh0-6, 0-6
2024-11-09vs Unforced ErrorsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRyan Schreiber / Lori Fujimori vs Jesse Tano / Julie Park2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKenneth Delano / Jody Thomas vs Glenn Yee / Laura Shimada7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2024-11-02vs Cellar Dwellars 55+ Mixed 8.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesTom Peper / Lori Fujimori vs Makiko Brandon / Harold Grey6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKenneth Delano / Jennifer Harada vs Atsuko Sato / Kyle Tom1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRichard Mahoney / Jody Thomas vs Robert Beutenmiller / Rachelle Soohoo3-6, 3-6
2024-10-26vs BeretennisholicsLost 12
L#1 DoublesKenneth Delano / Jennifer Harada vs Lori Chang / Douglas Smith6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJody Thomas / Garren Thomas vs Ryan McCardell / Lani Fujimoto5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTom Peper / Lori Fujimori vs Lisa Barnes / Ryker Lammers6-4, 6-2
2024-10-19vs Team 96797Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRichard Mahoney / Jody Thomas vs Warlo Pasicaran / Lyn Joson0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGarren Thomas / Janet Fujiyama vs Benny Toledo / Cora Toledo4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTom Peper / Jennifer Harada vs Barry Ng / Toby Arakaki3-6, 3-6
2024-10-12vs KaneoheLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennifer Harada / Tom Peper vs Jauchia Blythe / Irwin Kahakui6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJanet Fujiyama / Richard Mahoney vs Noreen Ono / Michael Racoma0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJody Thomas / Kenneth Delano vs Yvette Hida / Mereck Pang6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-10-05vs OC Mix & MatchLost 03
L#1 DoublesJody Thomas / Ryan Schreiber vs Greg Cleland / Joni Tamayo-Wilson5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKenneth Delano / Lori Fujimori vs ILYA RUCHYEV / Jony Conching2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRichard Mahoney / Jennifer Harada vs Michael Hamasu / Hiromi Saito1-6, 2-6
2024-09-28vs Party MixWon 21
W#1 DoublesJody Thomas / Kenneth Delano vs Tonya Dale / Lance Manabe6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTom Peper / Janet Fujiyama vs Maile Michelle Watkins / Mark Watkins6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGarren Thomas / Jennifer Harada vs Linda Landau / Mark Landau4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Team 967977219818185
2Cellar Dwellars 55+ Mixed 8.07221619213
3Unforced Errors63141331244
4Racquet Masters54131432256
5Beretennisholics45121535264
6Kaneohe3691838265
7OC Mix & Match27101739279
8Party Mix1862144277
9Ko Olina Krew1862144299

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Lori Fujimori
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.38
Jane Turner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Tom Peper
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.15
Richard Mahoney
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.15
Jennifer Harada
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Janet Fujiyama
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Garren Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Jeffrey Tonkel
published
Jessalyn Lopez
published
Jody Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kenneth Delano
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Stewart Turner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Harada + Kenneth Delano134 matchesnot enough data
Jody Thomas + Kenneth Delano224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lori Fujimori
87W–106L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
Jane Turner
30W–59L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.38
Tom Peper
7W–4L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.26
Richard Mahoney
8W–25L career · 5 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Jennifer Harada
60W–104L career · 9 lines in 2024
13%86%<1%
3.15
3.5
Janet Fujiyama
125W–100L career · 5 lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
3.13
Garren Thomas
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeffrey Tonkel
14W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jessalyn Lopez
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jody Thomas
2W–13L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kenneth Delano
32W–23L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stewart Turner
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.