Teams

Sharp-Ishmael/JB/AP

2025 Adult Singles 18 & Over Novice · 2.5 Women's Novice

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-18vs Carpenter/JB/RPCCWon 21
W#1 SinglesJami Sharp vs Ashley Snider6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesKristie Becker vs Angela Deveney1-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesJeanne Bailey vs Shallen Gorman6-0, 6-0
2025-12-10vs Cissell/JB/APWon 21
W#1 SinglesJami Sharp vs Sheng Judilla6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAlyssa Ishmael vs Jenny Rogers6-1, 6-0
L#3 SinglesKristie Becker vs Aspyn Satterwhite2-6, 2-6
2025-11-17vs Dallas/JB/APLost 12
W#1 SinglesJami Sharp vs Veronica Trimarchi6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesLindsay Massey vs Kylie DeVries0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesKristie Becker vs Rylee Bailey2-6, 1-6
2025-11-12vs Dallas/JB/APWon 21
W#1 SinglesJami Sharp vs Sharika Minor6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAlyssa Ishmael vs Veronica Trimarchi6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesKristie Becker vs June Long6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2025-11-11vs Carpenter/JB/RPCCLost 12
W#1 SinglesKristie Becker vs Shallen Gorman6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLindsay Massey vs Angela Deveney4-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesJordan Loebach vs Erin Gibson6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2025-10-30vs Cissell/JB/APWon 21
W#1 SinglesJami Sharp vs Caitlin Sullins6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJordan Loebach vs Beth McCartney0-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesAlyssa Ishmael vs Jenny Rogers6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women's Novice have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.37 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.62
Jeanne Bailey
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.48
Jami Sharp
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.46
Alyssa Ishmael
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.34
Jordan Loebach
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.16
Lindsay Massey
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.14
Kristie Becker
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alyssa Ishmael + Jami Sharp3447% games−3.8% vs expected
Jordan Loebach + Jeanne Bailey224 matchesnot enough data
Kristie Becker + Jami Sharp224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeanne Bailey
18W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
0%20%80%
2.62
Jami Sharp
24W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%55%45%
2.48
2.5
Alyssa Ishmael
31W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%60%40%
2.46
Jordan Loebach
8W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%87%13%
2.34
Lindsay Massey
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16
Kristie Becker
8W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.