Teams

7.0M Q Team

2025 USTA Adult 55 & Over · Men 7.0- 55 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-05vs Montana/Trangmoe/55&OverLost 02
L#1 DoublesSteven Schwartz / Jerry Fletcher vs Matt Munding / Greg Trangmoe3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBill Wilcox / Dan Wahle vs Kelly Crisp / Bruce Hazeltine2-6, 3-6
2025-08-03vs Montana/Trangmoe/55&OverLost 03
L#1 DoublesRichard Schaub / Bill Wilcox vs Brian Clifton / Ross Tillman6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJerry Fletcher / Steven Schwartz vs Bruce Hazeltine / Kelly Crisp2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKeith Nelson / Dan Wahle vs Troy Bean / Ray Nickless3-6, 3-6
2025-07-31vs Montana/Trangmoe/55&OverLost 12
L#1 DoublesSteven Schwartz / Dan Wahle vs Troy Bean / Ray Nickless5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKeith Nelson / Bill Wilcox vs Ross Tillman / Brian Clifton7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMark Mohorcich / Richard Schaub vs Matt Munding / Greg Trangmoe4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.0- 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bill Wilcox
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Dan Wahle
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Glenn Moffatt
published 3
Jerry Fletcher
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Keith Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Mark Mohorcich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Schaub
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Steven Schwartz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Thomas McLain
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Schwartz + Bill Wilcox3448% gamesnot enough data
Steven Schwartz + Jerry Fletcher1543% gamesnot enough data
Steven Schwartz + Dan Wahle123 matchesnot enough data
Bill Wilcox + Jerry Fletcher123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bill Wilcox
16W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Dan Wahle
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.06
3
Glenn Moffatt
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jerry Fletcher
6W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Keith Nelson
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Mohorcich
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Richard Schaub
15W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steven Schwartz
14W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas McLain
9W–20L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.